Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

DELAYS IN SHARE ACQUISITION NOTIFICATIONS DUE TO MISINTERPRETATION OF “IMMEDIATE HOLDING” FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MAQASHID AL-SHARI’AH: A Study of KPPU Decision No. 18/KPPU-M/2020

Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial · Vol. 16 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 321–339

DOI
10.22373/a5r4hr79
ISSN
2580-5363, 2088-9712
Terbit
2026-10-27
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The obligation to notify share acquisitions to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an important instrument to monitor transactions that have the potential to lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. However, misinterpretation of the concept of immediate holding in the company's ownership structure can cause delays in fulfilling this obligation. This study aims to analyze the delay in notification of share acquisitions in KPPU Decision Number 18/KPPU-M/2020 based on the perspective of Maqashid Shari'ah Imam Al-Syathibi, specifically the concept of Hifz al-mal. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively with a descriptive-analytical method. The results of the study indicate that the obligation to notify share acquisitions is regulated in Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999 in conjunction with Article 5 of Government Regulation Number 57 of 2010 that Taiko Plantations Pte. Ltd. was imposed an administrative fine of Rp1,500,000,000.00 for late notification of the acquisition of shares in PT Putra Bongan Jaya. From a Hifz al-mal perspective, the imposition of this sanction is justified as an effort to protect the economic interests of the community and maintain the effectiveness of competition supervision. However, misinterpretation of the concept of immediate holding needs to be considered in assessing the proportionality of the sanction, without eliminating the notification obligation and the company's administrative responsibilities. Therefore, clarity is needed in the KPPU guidelines regarding company ownership structures and notification obligations to create legal certainty, justice, and economic benefits.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

16 penulis · 25 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Siti JubaidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Budi DharmaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syahfrilla Al Risa Nurul AzmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad ArifUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Rahima KumalaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
KHAIRUN NISAUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Mawaddah IrhamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad SyahbudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SuhardinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isnaini HarahapAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Chuzaimah BatubaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sukiati SukiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Firdaus Bin Abdul ManafAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kamarusdiana KamarusdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/dustur/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">DELAYS IN SHARE ACQUISITION NOTIFICATIONS DUE TO MISINTERPRETATION OF “IMMEDIATE HOLDING” FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MAQASHID AL-SHARI’AH: A Study of KPPU Decision No. 18/KPPU-M/2020</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alifiya, Tasya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rokan, Mustapa Khamal</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">acquisition notification, immediate holding, maqashid shari'ah</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The obligation to notify share acquisitions to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an important instrument to monitor transactions that have the potential to lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. However, misinterpretation of the concept of immediate holding in the company's ownership structure can cause delays in fulfilling this obligation. This study aims to analyze the delay in notification of share acquisitions in KPPU Decision Number 18/KPPU-M/2020 based on the perspective of Maqashid Shari'ah Imam Al-Syathibi, specifically the concept of Hifz al-mal. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively with a descriptive-analytical method. The results of the study indicate that the obligation to notify share acquisitions is regulated in Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999 in conjunction with Article 5 of Government Regulation Number 57 of 2010 that Taiko Plantations Pte. Ltd. was imposed an administrative fine of Rp1,500,000,000.00 for late notification of the acquisition of shares in PT Putra Bongan Jaya. From a Hifz al-mal perspective, the imposition of this sanction is justified as an effort to protect the economic interests of the community and maintain the effectiveness of competition supervision. However, misinterpretation of the concept of immediate holding needs to be considered in assessing the proportionality of the sanction, without eliminating the notification obligation and the company's administrative responsibilities. Therefore, clarity is needed in the KPPU guidelines regarding company ownership structures and notification obligations to create legal certainty, justice, and economic benefits.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/dustur/article/view/37345</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/a5r4hr79</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL DUSTURIAH; 321-339</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-5363</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-9712</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/dustur/article/view/37345/13572</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Tasya Alifiya, Mustapa Khamal Rokan</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>