Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Aspect-based sentiment analysis: natural language understanding for implicit review

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 6 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6711-6722
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-12-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The different types of implicit reviews should be well understood so that the developed extraction technique can solve all problems in implicit reviews and produce precise terms of aspects and opinions. We propose an aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) method with natural language understanding for implicit reviews based on sentence and word structure. We built a text extraction method using a machine learning algorithm rule with a deep understanding of different types of sentences and words. Furthermore, the aspect category of each review is determined by measuring the word similarity between the aspect terms contained in each review and aspect keywords extracted from Wikipedia. Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) embedding and semantic similarity are used to measure the word similarity value. Moreover, the proposed ABSA method uses BERT, a hybrid lexicon, and manual weighting of opinion terms. The purpose of the hybrid lexicon and the manual weighting of opinion terms is to update the existing lexicon and solve the problem of weighting words and phrases of opinion terms. The evaluation results were very good, with average F1-scores of 93.84% for aspect categorization and 92.42% for ABSA.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 74 co-authorship links · 16 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Hasanuddin University
  • University of Indonesia
  • Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nanik SuciatiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember9
Diana PurwitasariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember8
Handayani TjandrasaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember7
Siti RochimahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember5
Kelly Rossa SungkonoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember5
Anny YuniartiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Ahmad SaikhuInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Imam GhozaliInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Hari GinardiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Hilya TsaniyaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Hendra MesraHasanuddin University2
Eha Renwi AstutiUniversitas Airlangga2
Ramadhan Hardani PutraUniversitas Airlangga2
Bilqis AmaliahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
M. Rahmat WidyantoUniversity of Indonesia1
Jayanti Yusmah SariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Mutmainnah MuchtarInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Evan TanuwijayaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Tohari AhmadInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Solichul HudaUniversitas Dian Nuswantoro1
Yuita Arum SariUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ratih Kartika DewiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Faisal RahutomoPoliteknik Negeri Malang1
Yudhi PurwanantoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Junaidi JunaidiAffiliation unknown1
Faida RoyaniAffiliation unknown1
Dewi RosidaAffiliation unknown1
Margo PudjiantaraInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Evy Kamilah RatnasariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Nur HayatinUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang1
Mustika MentariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Rizal Setya PerdanaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Ahmad Hayam BrilianAffiliation unknown1
Aditya BagusmulyaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Mirza Galih KurniawanInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Aspect-based sentiment analysis: natural language understanding for implicit review</dc:title><dc:creator>Suhariyanto, Suhariyanto</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sarno, Riyanarto</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fatichah, Chastine</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abdullah, Rachmad</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The different types of implicit reviews should be well understood so that the developed extraction technique can solve all problems in implicit reviews and produce precise terms of aspects and opinions. We propose an aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) method with natural language understanding for implicit reviews based on sentence and word structure. We built a text extraction method using a machine learning algorithm rule with a deep understanding of different types of sentences and words. Furthermore, the aspect category of each review is determined by measuring the word similarity between the aspect terms contained in each review and aspect keywords extracted from Wikipedia. Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) embedding and semantic similarity are used to measure the word similarity value. Moreover, the proposed ABSA method uses BERT, a hybrid lexicon, and manual weighting of opinion terms. The purpose of the hybrid lexicon and the manual weighting of opinion terms is to update the existing lexicon and solve the problem of weighting words and phrases of opinion terms. The evaluation results were very good, with average F1-scores of 93.84% for aspect categorization and 92.42% for ABSA.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-12-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6711-6722</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6711-6722</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 6 (2024); 6711</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/36262/17843</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>