Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Assessing risk factors for heart disease using machine learning methods

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 14 No. 6 (2024)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6734-6742
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2024-12-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This paper examines various machine learning methods for assessing risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. To build predictive models, two approaches were used: the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The focus is on analyzing the performance of each model in classification and regression tasks, as well as their ability to identify key biomarkers and risk factors such as cholesterol, ferritin, homocysteine and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. XGBoost parameters have been optimized for working with tabular data, demonstrating high accuracy in risk prediction. The CNN model, despite the initial reduction in error on the training set, showed signs of overfitting when analyzing validation data. Performance evaluation using the metrics of mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R²), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) revealed significant differences between the models. The study results confirm the effectiveness of XGBoost in analyzing tabular data and summarizing risk factor knowledge, while the CNN model needs further optimization to handle sparse data. The work demonstrates the importance of choosing the right model architecture and training parameters to ensure reliable diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 165 co-authorship links · 89 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
  • Dulaty University
  • Astana International University
  • Kazakh Technology and Business University named after K.Kulazhanov
  • Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University
  • Medical Center Hospital of the President’s affairs Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Akhmet Baitursynuly Kostanay Regional University
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ayagoz MukhanovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University2
Zhanna B. SadirmekovaDulaty University1
Murat Sauranbayevich TulenbayevDulaty University1
Aslanbek MurzakhmetovDulaty University1
Zhanar AltynbekovaKazakh National Women's Teacher Training University1
Shynar AkhmetzhanovaDulaty University1
Gauhar BorankulovaAffiliation unknown1
Gulkiz ZhidekulovaDulaty University1
Aigul Turyszhanovna TungatarovaDulaty University1
Nurbolat TasbolatulyAstana International University1
Mira KaldarovaAstana International University1
Ulmeken SmailovaNazarbayev Intellectual Schools1
Ainagul MukhomedyarovaZhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University1
Zhanar AlimovaAffiliation unknown1
Marat TynykulovAffiliation unknown1
Adilbek TanirbergenovL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Galiya MukhamedrakhimovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Madiyar BaitemirovL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Artyom IgnatovichMaqsut Narikbayev University1
Aigulim BayegizovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Ideyat BapiyevZhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University1
Ainur OrazayevaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Gulmira ShangytbayevaAktobe Regional State University named after K.Zhubanov1
Assem GalymovaAffiliation unknown1
Ulzhalgas ZhunissovaAstana Medical University1
Aliya S. TergeussizovaAlmaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications1
Arailym TleubayevaAstana IT University1
Zhanat KenzhebayevaCaspian University1
Gulzhan MuratovaS.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University1
Ainur JumagaliyevaKazakh Technology and Business University named after K.Kulazhanov1
Amandos TulegulovKazakh Technology and Business University named after K.Kulazhanov1
Venera RystygulovaKazakh Technology and Business University named after K.Kulazhanov1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Assessing risk factors for heart disease using machine learning methods</dc:title><dc:creator>Maxutova, Natalya</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tussupov, Jamalbek</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kedelbayeva, Kamilya</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tynykulova, Assemgul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Balabayeva, Zulfiya</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yersultanova, Zauresh</dc:creator><dc:creator>Khamitova, Zhainagul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zhunussova, Kamila</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This paper examines various machine learning methods for assessing risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. To build predictive models, two approaches were used: the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The focus is on analyzing the performance of each model in classification and regression tasks, as well as their ability to identify key biomarkers and risk factors such as cholesterol, ferritin, homocysteine and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. XGBoost parameters have been optimized for working with tabular data, demonstrating high accuracy in risk prediction. The CNN model, despite the initial reduction in error on the training set, showed signs of overfitting when analyzing validation data. Performance evaluation using the metrics of mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R²), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) revealed significant differences between the models. The study results confirm the effectiveness of XGBoost in analyzing tabular data and summarizing risk factor knowledge, while the CNN model needs further optimization to handle sparse data. The work demonstrates the importance of choosing the right model architecture and training parameters to ensure reliable diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2024-12-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6734-6742</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6734-6742</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 14 No 6 (2024); 6734</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/36330/17845</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>