Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

How do EFL university student-writers prepare their draft? An analysis of writing strategy use in EFL writing instruction

Englisia : Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 60–73

DOI
10.22373/ej.v9i2.10374
ISSN
2527-6484, 2339-2576
Terbit
2022-04-30
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The use of writing strategy across writing levels in a virtual EFL writing course was still rarely found in the literature. To fill this gap, therefore, this current research aims at exploring writing strategy in EFL writing instruction. Informed by a research framework of descriptive case study, university student-writers who regularly attended a virtual academic writing course filled out the online writing strategy inventory (Yang & Plakans, 2012) and submitted the argumentative essays. The findings show that the writing strategy was diverse across levels. At the stage of before drafting the essay, all student-writers reread task requirement and understood the type of essay and organization, searched for valid references, and tried to avoid plagiarism. Moreover, student-writers with higher levels also summarized ideas, analyzed sentences and contents, and made writing plan. At drafting the essay, they double checked the requirement, revised the essay, reread the essay and the sample texts, and provided valid arguments. However, student-writer with lowest level was not used those strategies. At the stage of after drafting, student-writers in all levels applied similar several writing strategies. However, not all of them added new points from sample texts, references, and lecture. To the student-writer with the lowest level, several writing strategies were not applied. This may indicate that student-writers with higher levels have writing awareness to use writing strategy effectively to improve their essay. Then, it can be drawn a conclusion that the more writing strategies used during drafting the essay, the more score and the higher quality of the essay was possibly achieved.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

7 penulis · 10 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 8 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Indonesia Open University
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Fakhrurrazi M. AminInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa1
Nur SyamsiahUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung1
Anita AnitaPadjadjaran University1
Widya Rizky PratiwiIndonesia Open University1
Juhana JuhanaIndonesia Open University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/englisia/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 7 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">How do EFL university student-writers prepare their draft? An analysis of writing strategy use in EFL writing instruction</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sundari, Hanna</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Febriyanti, Rina Husnaini</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">EFL writing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Writing strategy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Writing instruction</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">University students</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The use of writing strategy across writing levels in a virtual EFL writing course was still rarely found in the literature. To fill this gap, therefore, this current research aims at exploring writing strategy in EFL writing instruction. Informed by a research framework of descriptive case study, university student-writers who regularly attended a virtual academic writing course filled out the online writing strategy inventory (Yang &amp;amp; Plakans, 2012) and submitted the argumentative essays. The findings show that the writing strategy was diverse across levels. At the stage of before drafting the essay, all student-writers reread task requirement and understood the type of essay and organization, searched for valid references, and tried to avoid plagiarism. Moreover, student-writers with higher levels also summarized ideas, analyzed sentences and contents, and made writing plan. At drafting the essay, they double checked the requirement, revised the essay, reread the essay and the sample texts, and provided valid arguments. However, student-writer with lowest level was not used those strategies. At the stage of after drafting, student-writers in all levels applied similar several writing strategies. However, not all of them added new points from sample texts, references, and lecture. To the student-writer with the lowest level, several writing strategies were not applied. This may indicate that student-writers with higher levels have writing awareness to use writing strategy effectively to improve their essay. Then, it can be drawn a conclusion that the more writing strategies used during drafting the essay, the more score and the higher quality of the essay was possibly achieved.   </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/englisia/article/view/10374</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/ej.v9i2.10374</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Englisia : Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022); 60-73</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Englisia Journal; Vol 9 No 2 (2022); 60-73</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2527-6484</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-2576</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/englisia/article/view/10374/6861</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Hanna Sundari, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>