Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Evaluating the effectiveness of machine learning methods for keyword coverage using semantic data analysis

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v15i1.pp559-568
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2025-02-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of two advanced hybrid machine learning approaches for keyword extraction: bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) combined with autoencoder (AE) and term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) combined with autoencoder. The research targets the task of semantic analysis in text data to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in ensuring adequate keyword coverage across diverse text corpora. The study delves into the architecture and operational principles of each method, with a particular focus on the integration with autoencoders to enhance the semantic integrity and relevance of the extracted keywords. The experimental section provides a detailed performance analysis of both methods on various text datasets, highlighting how the structure and semantic richness of the source data influence the outcomes. The evaluation methodology includes precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and their suitability for specific keyword extraction tasks. The findings offer valuable insights for the scientific community, aiding in the selection of the most appropriate text processing method for applications requiring deep semantic understanding and high accuracy in information extraction.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 178 co-authorship links · 93 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
  • S.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University
  • Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University
  • Aktobe Regional State University named after K.Zhubanov
  • Astana International University
  • Institute of Ionosphere
  • Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Murat AitimovAcademy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan3
Zagira SaimanovaAbylkas Saginov Karaganda Technical University2
Ideyat BapiyevZhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University2
Gulzira AbdikerimovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Aigul Kayrulaevna ShaikhanovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Gulmira ShangytbayevaAktobe Regional State University named after K.Zhubanov1
Samal KaliyevaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Laura SugurovaAffiliation unknown1
Zharkynay SugurL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Akbota YerzhanovaS.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University1
Dinara KaibassovaAstana IT University1
Lazzat ZholshiyevaAstana International University1
Zhanat ManbetovaAffiliation unknown1
Zhuldyz TashenovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Saduakas BaizhumanovAffiliation unknown1
Kulaisha AikhynbayM.Auezov South Kazakhstan State University1
Mira KaldarovaAstana International University1
Kaiyrbek MakulovAffiliation unknown1
Raikhan MuratkhanKaraganda Buketov University1
Serik NurakynovInstitute of Ionosphere1
Nurmakhambet SydykInstitute of Ionosphere1
Assem KonyrkhanovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Aida IssembayevaZhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian Technical University1
Alisher SaltayevL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Maral OngarbayevaInternational Taraz University named after Sherkhan Murtaza1
Gulnur IssakovaS.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University1
Natalya GlazyrinaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Roza BekbayevaShakarim University1
Marzhan TurarovaL. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University1
Lazzat AbdykerimovaAffiliation unknown1
Ulmeken SmailovaNazarbayev Intellectual Schools1
Leila KassenovaEsil University1
Ulzada AitimovaS.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Evaluating the effectiveness of machine learning methods for keyword coverage using semantic data analysis</dc:title><dc:creator>Shaushenova, Anargul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bayegizova, Aigulim</dc:creator><dc:creator>Baidrakhmanova, Gulnaz</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abuova, Zhanargul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kassymova, Akmaral</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bakirova, Dana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Golenko, Yekaterina</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This article presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of two advanced hybrid machine learning approaches for keyword extraction: bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) combined with autoencoder (AE) and term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) combined with autoencoder. The research targets the task of semantic analysis in text data to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in ensuring adequate keyword coverage across diverse text corpora. The study delves into the architecture and operational principles of each method, with a particular focus on the integration with autoencoders to enhance the semantic integrity and relevance of the extracted keywords. The experimental section provides a detailed performance analysis of both methods on various text datasets, highlighting how the structure and semantic richness of the source data influence the outcomes. The evaluation methodology includes precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and their suitability for specific keyword extraction tasks. The findings offer valuable insights for the scientific community, aiding in the selection of the most appropriate text processing method for applications requiring deep semantic understanding and high accuracy in information extraction.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-02-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v15i1.pp559-568</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v15i1.pp559-568</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 15 No 1 (2025); 559</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/36745/18008</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>