Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Implementation of Restorative Justice in Surakarta District Court

Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 85–101

DOI
10.22373/legitimasi.v13i1.23451
ISSN
2579-5104, 2088-8813
Terbit
2024-06-30
Penerbit
Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The postponement of the Decree of the Director General of Badilum Number 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the General Court Environment by Letter Number 1209/DJU/PS.00/11/2021 until the Supreme Court regulations regarding guidelines for justice come into force Restorative raises problems, namely what the Surakarta District Court's policy is regarding the implementation of justice. This field research type uses interview and documentation data collection methods and data analysis techniques using the interactive model from Miles and Huberman. The research results show that in their authority to examine and adjudicate cases, judges must pay attention to contextual matters in resolving cases using a restorative justice approach, which resolves criminal cases by involving perpetrators, victims, and other parties who work together to find a satisfactory solution. fair by emphasizing restoration to the original state, not retaliation. Resolving cases using restorative justice, lack of support and cooperation between institutions, and the justice system not regulating much about victims' rights.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

6 penulis · 9 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Endang TrowulanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Radipta LailatussifaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lego SuhonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/legitimasi/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 7 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Implementation of Restorative Justice in Surakarta District Court</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fattaah, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sutrisno, Sutrisno</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susila, Jaka</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Restorative Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">District Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Surakarta</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The postponement of the Decree of the Director General of Badilum Number 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the General Court Environment by Letter Number 1209/DJU/PS.00/11/2021 until the Supreme Court regulations regarding guidelines for justice come into force Restorative raises problems, namely what the Surakarta District Court's policy is regarding the implementation of justice. This field research type uses interview and documentation data collection methods and data analysis techniques using the interactive model from Miles and Huberman. The research results show that in their authority to examine and adjudicate cases, judges must pay attention to contextual matters in resolving cases using a restorative justice approach, which resolves criminal cases by involving perpetrators, victims, and other parties who work together to find a satisfactory solution. fair by emphasizing restoration to the original state, not retaliation. Resolving cases using restorative justice, lack of support and cooperation between institutions, and the justice system not regulating much about victims' rights.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/legitimasi/article/view/23451</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/legitimasi.v13i1.23451</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024); 85-101</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2579-5104</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-8813</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/legitimasi/article/view/23451/9658</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul Fattaah, Sutrisno, Jaka Susila</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>