Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Inheritance Development Patterns in Multiethnic Societies in Indonesia: Between Custom, Religion, and State

Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 434–467

DOI
10.22373/sjhk.v10.i1.32673
ISSN
2549-3167, 2549-3132
Terbit
2026-03-25
Penerbit
Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the patterns for developing inherited assets in multiethnic communities in Pasaman and Dharmasraya (West Sumatra) and Mandailing Natal and Panyabungan (North Sumatra). The research focuses on the interaction between customary, religious, and state laws in inheritance practices and their implications for social relations, family cohesion, and economic orientation. Using a qualitative comparative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis with inter-ethnic families. The research findings reveal three distinct patterns of heritage development. The collective-conservative pattern in Pasaman emphasizes family solidarity and asset preservation, while also reflecting internal power relations and potential conflicts of interest in decision-making. The customary-conservative pattern in Dharmasraya highlights the dominance of customary norms in heritage management, oriented toward social stability and cultural preservation, yet it can also reinforce traditional authority structures and symbolic subordination. Meanwhile, the individualistic-commercial pattern in Mandailing Natal prioritizes maximizing economic value and enhancing family economic mobility, but it may generate social differentiation and economic inequality among family members. These findings indicate that heritage development patterns are shaped not only by economic considerations but also by “ethnic logic” rooted in kinship structures, customary norms, and social relations. Across most locations, customary law remains the dominant framework, religious law provides moral legitimacy and distribution guidance, and state law is applied selectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that legal pluralism in Indonesia’s multi-ethnic context is not merely a normative reality, but also a socially chosen strategy.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

17 penulis · 32 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Putra Indonesia "YPTK"
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yan FajriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Bakhtiar BakhtiarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fitra NelliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nuraini NurainiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Astriana NapirahUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Zulfan ZulfanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Salma WatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elimartati ElimartatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ashabul FadhliUniversitas Putra Indonesia "YPTK"1
Muhammad Hizbi IslamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Asasriwarni AsasriwarniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
E. ElfiaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 7 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Inheritance Development Patterns in Multiethnic Societies in Indonesia: Between Custom, Religion, and State</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Elfia, Elfia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nurus, Nurus Shalihin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Surwati, Surwati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yan, Yan fajri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mardiyah, Siti Mardiyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Customary Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Inheritance Asset Development</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Multi-Ethnic</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to analyze the patterns for developing inherited assets in multiethnic communities in Pasaman and Dharmasraya (West Sumatra) and Mandailing Natal and Panyabungan (North Sumatra). The research focuses on the interaction between customary, religious, and state laws in inheritance practices and their implications for social relations, family cohesion, and economic orientation. Using a qualitative comparative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis with inter-ethnic families. The research findings reveal three distinct patterns of heritage development. The collective-conservative pattern in Pasaman emphasizes family solidarity and asset preservation, while also reflecting internal power relations and potential conflicts of interest in decision-making. The customary-conservative pattern in Dharmasraya highlights the dominance of customary norms in heritage management, oriented toward social stability and cultural preservation, yet it can also reinforce traditional authority structures and symbolic subordination. Meanwhile, the individualistic-commercial pattern in Mandailing Natal prioritizes maximizing economic value and enhancing family economic mobility, but it may generate social differentiation and economic inequality among family members. These findings indicate that heritage development patterns are shaped not only by economic considerations but also by “ethnic logic” rooted in kinship structures, customary norms, and social relations. Across most locations, customary law remains the dominant framework, religious law provides moral legitimacy and distribution guidance, and state law is applied selectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that legal pluralism in Indonesia’s multi-ethnic context is not merely a normative reality, but also a socially chosen strategy. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-03-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/32673</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/sjhk.v10.i1.32673</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam; 434-467</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3167</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-3132</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22373/bzg6vz14</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/samarah/article/view/32673/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Elfia Elfia, Nurus Shalihin, Surwati Surwati, Yan Fajri and Siti Mardiyah</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>