Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Menggagas Tafsir Ayat Hukum Dalam Kerangka Fiqh Al-Ikhtilaf

Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin · Vol. 18 No. 2 (2016) · hlm. 129–146

DOI
10.22373/substantia.v18i2.2983
ISSN
2356-1955, 1411-4976
Terbit
2016-10-01
Penerbit
Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Opinion differences in the interpretation of verses regarding jurisprudence might create an impression that there is a disharmony among the teachings of the Qur'an. In fact, verse 82 of Surah An-Nisa emphasize that there is no contradiction in the Qur'an. However, jurisprudence studies do not accommodate this issue. The differences are perceived only as problems of furukiyah. This difference indeed emerges on the fundamental issues of Islamic teaching. Unfortunately, interpretation studies do not address this issue either as its orientation focuses more on the discovery of meaning. Therefore, this paper offers a theoretical framework of fiqh al-ikhtilaf in order for the interpretation not to see differences in jurisprudence verses as a contradiction but see it as a form of diversities (al-ta'addud al-tanawwu'). By combining deductive interpretation and critical analysis method, this paper studies the philosophical basis in the interpretation of jurisprudence verses. The philosophical foundations include basic assumptions, paradigms, and theoretical framework. Furthermore, using a philosophical approach, this study concludes that the theoretical framework of fiqh al-iktilaf is appropriate to address the differences in the interpretation of the jurisprudence verses.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

12 penulis · 21 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Tarmizi M JakfarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fuad RamlyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maimun FuadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Juliana JulianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arifin AbdullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizkaul HasanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syafrizal SyafrizalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad HaikalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arinal RahmatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
MurdaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fauzi ShalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/substantia/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 7 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Menggagas Tafsir Ayat Hukum Dalam Kerangka Fiqh Al-Ikhtilaf</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sabil, Jabbar</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Tafsir</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ikhtilaf</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Hukum</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Opinion differences in the interpretation of verses regarding jurisprudence might create an impression that there is a disharmony among the teachings of the Qur'an. In fact, verse 82 of Surah An-Nisa emphasize that there is no contradiction in the Qur'an.  However, jurisprudence studies do not accommodate this issue. The differences are perceived only as problems of furukiyah.  This difference indeed emerges on the fundamental issues of Islamic teaching. Unfortunately, interpretation studies do not address this issue either as its orientation focuses more on the discovery of meaning. Therefore, this paper offers a theoretical framework of fiqh al-ikhtilaf in order for the interpretation not to see differences in jurisprudence verses as a contradiction but see it as a form of diversities (al-ta'addud al-tanawwu'). By combining deductive interpretation and critical analysis method, this paper studies the philosophical basis in the interpretation of jurisprudence verses. The philosophical foundations include basic assumptions, paradigms, and theoretical framework. Furthermore, using a philosophical approach, this study concludes that the theoretical framework of fiqh al-iktilaf is appropriate to address the differences in the interpretation of the jurisprudence verses.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2016-10-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/substantia/article/view/2983</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/substantia.v18i2.2983</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2016); 129-146</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2356-1955</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1411-4976</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22373/substantia.v18i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/substantia/article/view/2983/2145</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2016 Jabbar Sabil</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>