Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Pretrial Reform in Indonesia: A Study of Pretrial Hearings at the Sharia Court of Aceh Province

El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 1204–1231

DOI
10.22373/ujhk.v8i2.29992
ISSN
2620-8083, 2620-8075
Terbit
2025-12-31
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to examine pretrial as stated in the Code of Criminal Procedure. This study is a normative legal study using a statutory approach and examines dozens of court decisions related to pretrial. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that the current pretrial institution still has weaknesses, namely unclear procedural law, passive and post factum testing, the application is dropped after the main case is delegated, there is no legal remedy, the examination is only formal-administrative. The main cause of these weaknesses is because the Criminal Procedure Code adheres to the principle of functional differentiation, which strictly divides authority between the criminal justice subsystems. The next conclusion is that the ideal court supervision of criminal justice is a concept of supervision that is in the middle between the interests of the state to enforce the law and the interests of the community whose rights must be guaranteed so that they cannot be arbitrarily taken away. This supervision is carried out by the Commissioner Judge who has the authority to materially test all actions of other criminal justice subsystems from the pre-adjudication stage to the post-adjudication stage. From this research, it is suggested that in the upcoming update of the Criminal Procedure Code, it is necessary to change the design of the criminal justice system from functional differentiation to court centric or centered on the court.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

17 penulis · 30 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Mahdi SyahbandarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Asmaul HusnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Devi FaradilaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ida MulyanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurrahman AbdurrahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Husni HusniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfadli ZulfadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suryo Sumantri DarmoyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andri KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mahfud MahfudAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syaibatul HamdiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lia SautunnidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iskandar A. GaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Melvi Salsabil AzriandaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/usrah/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 7 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Pretrial Reform in Indonesia: A Study of Pretrial Hearings at the Sharia Court of Aceh Province</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Desnata, Rangga Lukita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Purnama, Eddy</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yani, Teuku Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pretrial</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">supervision</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">commisioner judge</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">egal justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sociological Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to examine pretrial as stated in the Code of Criminal Procedure. This study is a normative legal study using a statutory approach and examines dozens of court decisions related to pretrial. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that the current pretrial institution still has weaknesses, namely unclear procedural law, passive and post factum testing, the application is dropped after the main case is delegated, there is no legal remedy, the examination is only formal-administrative. The main cause of these weaknesses is because the Criminal Procedure Code adheres to the principle of functional differentiation, which strictly divides authority between the criminal justice subsystems. The next conclusion is that the ideal court supervision of criminal justice is a concept of supervision that is in the middle between the interests of the state to enforce the law and the interests of the community whose rights must be guaranteed so that they cannot be arbitrarily taken away. This supervision is carried out by the Commissioner Judge who has the authority to materially test all actions of other criminal justice subsystems from the pre-adjudication stage to the post-adjudication stage. From this research, it is suggested that in the upcoming update of the Criminal Procedure Code, it is necessary to change the design of the criminal justice system from functional differentiation to court centric or centered on the court.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/usrah/article/view/29992</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22373/ujhk.v8i2.29992</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): EL-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga; 1204-1231</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-8083</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-8075</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/usrah/article/view/29992/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Rangga Lukita Desnata, Eddy Purnama and Teuku Ahmad Yani</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>