Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Breast cancer detection using ensemble methods

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 15 No. 6 (2025)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5633-5646
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2025-12-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers among women. This study's framework is divided into three phases. Firstly, a majority hard voting approach is used to apply an ensemble classification mechanism as a decision fusion technique on the level of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Five pre-trained CNNs—visual geometry group 19 (VGG19), densely connected convolutional network 201 (DenseNet201), residual network 50 (ResNet50), mobile network version 2 (MobileNetV2), and inception version 3 (InceptionV3)—are evaluated, using a data splitting test ratio represents 30% of the total dataset. Secondly, the classification results of the five CNNs are compared to get the best-performance model. Then, seven state of art machine classifiers—decision tree (DT), histogram-based gradient boosting classifier (HGB), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), gradient boosting (GB), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—are used to improve system performance on the feature vector that was taken from this CNN model. Thirdly, to improve robustness, a majority hard voting technique is used at the external classifier level using the highest four classifiers selected based on their accuracy. Several experiments were conducted in this study, and the results showed that ResNet50 produced the best results in terms of precision and accuracy. The majority voting mechanism improves the system’s accuracy to 99.85% through CNNs and to 100% through traditional classifiers.

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 9 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Mansoura University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Asmaa Helmy ZaidMansoura University1
Fayez W. ZakiMansoura University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Breast cancer detection using ensemble methods</dc:title><dc:creator>Ghazy, Alaa Mohamed</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nafea, Hala Bahy</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zaki, Fayez Wanis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Amer, Hanan Mohamed</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers among women. This study's framework is divided into three phases. Firstly, a majority hard voting approach is used to apply an ensemble classification mechanism as a decision fusion technique on the level of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Five pre-trained CNNs—visual geometry group 19 (VGG19), densely connected convolutional network 201 (DenseNet201), residual network 50 (ResNet50), mobile network version 2 (MobileNetV2), and inception version 3 (InceptionV3)—are evaluated, using a data splitting test ratio represents 30% of the total dataset. Secondly, the classification results of the five CNNs are compared to get the best-performance model. Then, seven state of art machine classifiers—decision tree (DT), histogram-based gradient boosting classifier (HGB), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), gradient boosting (GB), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—are used to improve system performance on the feature vector that was taken from this CNN model. Thirdly, to improve robustness, a majority hard voting technique is used at the external classifier level using the highest four classifiers selected based on their accuracy. Several experiments were conducted in this study, and the results showed that ResNet50 produced the best results in terms of precision and accuracy. The majority voting mechanism improves the system’s accuracy to 99.85% through CNNs and to 100% through traditional classifiers.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-12-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5633-5646</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5633-5646</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 15 No 6 (2025); 5633</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/40022/18550</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>