Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges in Addressing Cross-Border Cybercrime

AllahRakha, Naeem

doi:10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges in Addressing Cross-Border Cybercrime

AllahRakha, Naeem^{Tashkent State University of Law}

ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan · Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 153–172

DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633
ISSN: 2657-2125, 1978-8312
Terbit: 2025-02-04
Penerbit: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Bahasa: eng
Lisensi: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Cross-border cybercrime is identified as a growing concern due to the inherently borderless nature of cyberspace and the legal complexities associated with international cooperation and collaboration. Therefore, this research aims to examine the effectiveness of existing international legal frameworks, particularly the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, in harmonising national legislation and supporting cross-border investigations. A doctrinal research methodology was adopted to review current cybercrime regulations and assess how international standards related to due process and prosecution contribute to safeguarding individual rights and ensuring fair trials in cross-border contexts. However, the current legal frameworks for collecting and sharing digital evidence across jurisdictions remain fragmented, posing substantial challenges to practical cooperation among nations. This fragmentation was further exacerbated by the rapid advancement of digital technologies, which continued to outpace legal reform. Law enforcement agencies now face growing legal and privacy-related challenges, particularly when attempting to access cross-border data stored on cloud-based platforms. Moreover, the execution of mutual legal assistance requests in cybercrime investigations continued to remain slow and inefficient, largely due to procedural bottlenecks and a lack of coordination. Significant gaps within existing international frameworks continue to hinder lawful access to electronic evidence. Additionally, investigations are frequently delayed due to language differences, conflicting legal systems, and inadequate technical capacity among national authorities. These persistent challenges underscore the urgent need for a coordinated and standardised global strategy to address cross-border cybercrime.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

14 penulis · 35 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 11 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

Tashkent State University of Law
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
Jenderal Soedirman University
Tashkent State Agrarian University
Law Enforcement Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Afiliasi tidak diketahui

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Rayno Dwi Adityo	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Hajar Salamah Salsabila Hariz	Jenderal Soedirman University	1
Rayno Dwi Adityo	Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim	1
Sheila Kusuma Wardani Amnesti	Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim	1
Siti Zulaichah	Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim	1
Bozarov Sardor Sokhibjonovich	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Otabek Narziev	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Gulsanam Tillayeva	Tashkent State Agrarian University	1
Temurbek Pulatov	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Burxanova Leyla Mariusovna	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Umida Sharaxmetova	Tashkent State University of Law	1
Abdullayeva Malikabonu Erkin Kizi	Law Enforcement Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan	1
Akramov Akmaljon Anvarjon ugli	Tashkent State University of Law	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/adliya/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Jurisdiction and Due Process Challenges in Addressing Cross-Border Cybercrime</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>AllahRakha, Naeem</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">due process</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">e-crimes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">jurisdiction</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">cross-border</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">legal frameworks</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Cross-border cybercrime is identified as a growing concern due to the inherently borderless nature of cyberspace and the legal complexities associated with international cooperation and collaboration. Therefore, this research aims to examine the effectiveness of existing international legal frameworks, particularly the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, in harmonising national legislation and supporting cross-border investigations. A doctrinal research methodology was adopted to review current cybercrime regulations and assess how international standards related to due process and prosecution contribute to safeguarding individual rights and ensuring fair trials in cross-border contexts. However, the current legal frameworks for collecting and sharing digital evidence across jurisdictions remain fragmented, posing substantial challenges to practical cooperation among nations. This fragmentation was further exacerbated by the rapid advancement of digital technologies, which continued to outpace legal reform. Law enforcement agencies now face growing legal and privacy-related challenges, particularly when attempting to access cross-border data stored on cloud-based platforms. Moreover, the execution of mutual legal assistance requests in cybercrime investigations continued to remain slow and inefficient, largely due to procedural bottlenecks and a lack of coordination. Significant gaps within existing international frameworks continue to hinder lawful access to electronic evidence. Additionally, investigations are frequently delayed due to language differences, conflicting legal systems, and inadequate technical capacity among national authorities. These persistent challenges underscore the urgent need for a coordinated and standardised global strategy to address cross-border cybercrime.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-02-04</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/adliya/article/view/38633</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15575/adliya.v18i2.38633</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024): ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan; 153-172</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2657-2125</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-8312</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15575/adliya.v18i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/adliya/article/view/38633/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Naeem AllahRakha</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>