Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Faster R-CNN implementation for hand sign recognition of the Indonesian sign language system (SIBI)

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 15 No. 6 (2025)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5759-5769
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2025-12-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The Indonesian sign language system (SIBI) is the authorized sign system in Indonesia that the deaf society uses to convey in Indonesian. However, its use still needs to be expanded and more widespread in the community, causing difficulties in communication for hard-of-hearing people. The product of deep learning technologies such as faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) in object recognition has the potential to help improve communication between deaf people and the general public. This research will implement the Faster R-CNN algorithm with three different residual network (ResNet) architectures (50, 101, and 152) for SIBI recognition. The comparison of the faster R-CNN algorithm with different architectures is also conducted to identify the best architecture for SIBI recognition, and the results are evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics from confusion matrix calculation and execution time. Faster R-CNN model with ResNet-50 architecture showed the best and most efficient performance with accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score metrics of 96.15%, 95%, 93%, and 94%, respectively, and an execution time of 36.84 seconds in the testing process compared to models with ResNet-101 and ResNet-152 architectures.

Collaboration network of the authors

3 authors · 3 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Faster R-CNN implementation for hand sign recognition of the Indonesian sign language system (SIBI)</dc:title><dc:creator>Adhiatma, Paulus Lestyo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Prakisya, Nurcahya Pradana Taufik</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ariyuana, Rosihan</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The Indonesian sign language system (SIBI) is the authorized sign system in Indonesia that the deaf society uses to convey in Indonesian. However, its use still needs to be expanded and more widespread in the community, causing difficulties in communication for hard-of-hearing people. The product of deep learning technologies such as faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) in object recognition has the potential to help improve communication between deaf people and the general public. This research will implement the Faster R-CNN algorithm with three different residual network (ResNet) architectures (50, 101, and 152) for SIBI recognition. The comparison of the faster R-CNN algorithm with different architectures is also conducted to identify the best architecture for SIBI recognition, and the results are evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics from confusion matrix calculation and execution time. Faster R-CNN model with ResNet-50 architecture showed the best and most efficient performance with accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score metrics of 96.15%, 95%, 93%, and 94%, respectively, and an execution time of 36.84 seconds in the testing process compared to models with ResNet-101 and ResNet-152 architectures.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-12-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5759-5769</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v15i6.pp5759-5769</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 15 No 6 (2025); 5759</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/37652/18560</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>