Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

From YOLO V1 to YOLO V11: comparative analysis of YOLO algorithm (review)

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v16i1.pp450-462
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2026-02-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Object detection in images or videos faces several challenges because the detection must be accurate, efficient and fast. The you only look once (YOLO) algorithm was invented to meet these criteria. But with the creation of several versions of this algorithm (from V1 to V11), it becomes difficult for researchers to choose the best one. The main objective of this review is to present and compare the eleven versions of the yolo algorithm in order to know when using the appropriate one for the study. The methodology used for this work is aligned with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) principles and the results demonstrate that the choice of the best version mainly depends on the priorities of the study. If the study prioritizes accuracy and detection of small objects, it should use YOLO V4, YOLO V5, YOLO V6, YOLO V7, YOLO V8, YOLO V9, YOLO V10 or YOLO V11. While studies that prioritize detection speed should use YOLO V5, YOLO V6, YOLO V7, YOLO V8, YOLO V10 or YOLO V11. In complex environment, researchers should avoid using YOLO V1, YOLO V2, YOLO V3, YOLO V5, YOLO V7 and YOLO V9. And researchers who are looking for a good accuracy and speed and a reduced number of parameters should use YOLO V10 or YOLO V11.

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 15 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Université Hassan 1er
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>From YOLO V1 to YOLO V11: comparative analysis of  YOLO algorithm (review)</dc:title><dc:creator>Beqqali Hassani, Imane</dc:creator><dc:creator>Benhida, Soufia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lamii, Nabil</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oqaidi, Khalid</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ouiddad, Ahmed</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ghiadi, Soukaina</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Object detection in images or videos faces several challenges because the detection must be accurate, efficient and fast. The you only look once (YOLO) algorithm was invented to meet these criteria. But with the creation of several versions of this algorithm (from V1 to V11), it becomes difficult for researchers to choose the best one. The main objective of this review is to present and compare the eleven versions of the yolo algorithm in order to know when using the appropriate one for the study. The methodology used for this work is aligned with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) principles and the results demonstrate that the choice of the best version mainly depends on the priorities of the study. If the study prioritizes accuracy and detection of small objects, it should use YOLO V4, YOLO V5, YOLO V6, YOLO V7, YOLO V8, YOLO V9, YOLO V10 or YOLO V11. While studies that prioritize detection speed should use YOLO V5, YOLO V6, YOLO V7, YOLO V8, YOLO V10 or YOLO V11. In complex environment, researchers should avoid using YOLO V1, YOLO V2, YOLO V3, YOLO V5, YOLO V7 and YOLO V9. And researchers who are looking for a good accuracy and speed and a reduced number of parameters should use YOLO V10 or YOLO V11.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-02-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v16i1.pp450-462</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v16i1.pp450-462</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 16 No 1 (2026); 450</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/40094/18641</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>