Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Optimized ResNet-50 framework for mammogram-based breast cancer classification: a comparative evaluation with EfficientNet-B0

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 16 No. 3 (2026)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1199-1212
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2026-06-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, underscoring the need for accurate and reliable mammographic interpretation. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) based on deep learning has emerged as a promising approach to improve both screening performance and diagnostic consistency, yet fairness-driven comparisons between popular convolutional backbones on public mammogram benchmarks remain limited. This study provides a statistically validated, fairness-driven comparison of two widely used convolutional neural network architectures, ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B0, for mammogram-based breast cancer classification under a rigorously controlled, clinically motivated protocol. The proposed “optimized ResNet-50” framework is defined by patient-level stratified undersampling, paired 5-fold cross-validation with identical partitions, harmonized augmentation and training configurations, and dual statistical testing (paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests), emphasizing methodological rigor rather than architectural novelty. Across MIAS and CBIS-DDSM benchmarks, the models demonstrated complementary strengths, with EfficientNet-B0 excelling in screening-oriented tasks (normal vs. abnormal) and ResNet-50 offering more robust performance for diagnostic-oriented tasks (benign vs. malignant). These findings highlight the value of fairness-driven evaluation protocols in CAD research and support the feasibility of integrating lightweight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) into tiered clinical workflows, where different backbones are strategically deployed for initial screening and confirmatory assessment.

Collaboration network of the authors

3 authors · 3 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Cendekia Abditama
  • Gunadarma University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Optimized ResNet-50 framework for mammogram-based breast cancer classification: a comparative evaluation with EfficientNet-B0</dc:title><dc:creator>Subali, Muhammad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wisudawati, Lulu Mawaddah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Teresa, Teresa</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, underscoring the need for accurate and reliable mammographic interpretation. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) based on deep learning has emerged as a promising approach to improve both screening performance and diagnostic consistency, yet fairness-driven comparisons between popular convolutional backbones on public mammogram benchmarks remain limited. This study provides a statistically validated, fairness-driven comparison of two widely used convolutional neural network architectures, ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B0, for mammogram-based breast cancer classification under a rigorously controlled, clinically motivated protocol. The proposed “optimized ResNet-50” framework is defined by patient-level stratified undersampling, paired 5-fold cross-validation with identical partitions, harmonized augmentation and training configurations, and dual statistical testing (paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests), emphasizing methodological rigor rather than architectural novelty. Across MIAS and CBIS-DDSM benchmarks, the models demonstrated complementary strengths, with EfficientNet-B0 excelling in screening-oriented tasks (normal vs. abnormal) and ResNet-50 offering more robust performance for diagnostic-oriented tasks (benign vs. malignant). These findings highlight the value of fairness-driven evaluation protocols in CAD research and support the feasibility of integrating lightweight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) into tiered clinical workflows, where different backbones are strategically deployed for initial screening and confirmatory assessment.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-06-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1199-1212</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v16i3.pp1199-1212</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 16 No 3 (2026); 1199</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/41084/18744</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>