Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

EFL STUDENTS' PARAPHRASING STRATEGIES IN WRITING RESEARCH PROPOSAL

BELTIC Journal · Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 11–16

Terbit
2026-04-08
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study investigates the paraphrasing strategies and challenges faced by EFL students during research proposal writing, comparing manual and digital methods. Conducted at UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung with 10 participants from the English Education Department, the study used a qualitative descriptive-comparative design through questionnaires and interviews. Findings show that manual paraphrasing challenges include understanding complex texts and maintaining clarity, while digital methods often fail to convey intended meaning and risk plagiarism. Students addressed these issues through strategy use—manual techniques like synonym replacement and practice, and digital methods with tool selection and revision. A combined approach proved most effective, balancing clarity, originality, and efficiency. This study highlights the value of integrating both methods to support academic writing in EFL.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

15 penulis · 24 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Nia KurniawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Joni FebriansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ardheka NurhakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SajidinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hida Nurul Aulia RohmayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elida Siriyah AlfiyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Darwis Jauhari BanduAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pupung RustikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rully Agung YudhiantaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meli AgustinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Reina Siti AinurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tedi RohadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/belticjournal/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">EFL STUDENTS' PARAPHRASING STRATEGIES IN WRITING RESEARCH PROPOSAL</dc:title>
	<dc:creator> Rahmah, Rizzandya Aulia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator> Siswayani, Predari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Jauhari Bandu, Darwis</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">EFL Students</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Paraphrasing Strategies</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Manual Paraphrasing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Digital  Paraphrasing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Academic Writing Challenges</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Research Proposals</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study investigates the paraphrasing strategies and challenges faced by EFL students during research proposal writing, comparing manual and digital methods. Conducted at UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung with 10 participants from the English Education Department, the study used a qualitative descriptive-comparative design through questionnaires and interviews. Findings show that manual paraphrasing challenges include understanding complex texts and maintaining clarity, while digital methods often fail to convey intended meaning and risk plagiarism. Students addressed these issues through strategy use—manual techniques like synonym replacement and practice, and digital methods with tool selection and revision. A combined approach proved most effective, balancing clarity, originality, and efficiency. This study highlights the value of integrating both methods to support academic writing in EFL.
 </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-04-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/belticjournal/article/view/48086</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">BELTIC Journal; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): BELTIC Journal; 11-16</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/belticjournal/article/view/48086/16330</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Breakthrough English Language Teaching in Islamic Context</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>