Melola Discovery

โ† Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Numerical investigation on the effect of blade count on the performance of a small-scale Savonius wind turbine

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) ยท Vol. 16 No. 5 (2026)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2335-2346
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2026-10-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The growing demand for clean energy has increased interest in small-scale wind turbines, particularly vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs), which perform well in turbulent wind conditions and low wind speeds. This study numerically analyzes Savonius rotors with two, three, and four blades to evaluate their aerodynamic performance in uniform inflow. Simulations were performed with a steady-state multiple reference frame (MRF) model at an inflow velocity of 10 m/s. Key parameters used included the torque coefficient ( ๐ถ๐‘‡ ), power coefficient ( ๐ถ๐‘ ), and tip speed ratio ( ๐œ† ). The results show a clear trade-off between configurations. The four-blade rotor produces the highest torque (0.1297 Nยทm at 950 rpm) and strong self-starting capability, although its peak efficiency ( ๐ถ๐‘ โ‰ˆ0.60) is likely too high due to model simplification. The two-bladed rotor achieves higher efficiency ( ๐ถ๐‘ โ‰ˆ0.24) at ๐œ† โ‰ˆ0.52 but exhibits significant torque fluctuations. Conversely, the three-bladed rotor produces the lowest efficiency ( ๐ถ๐‘ โ‰ˆ0.086) but offers smoother torque, beneficial for stable small-scale power generation. Flow analysis confirms this pattern: two blades cause a wide, asymmetrical wake; three blades reduce wake asymmetry with better stability; and four blades produce a compact wake but with higher drag. Overall, the optimal number of blades depends on design prioritiesโ€”efficiency, torque, or operational smoothness.

Collaboration network of the authors

7 authors ยท 21 co-authorship links ยท 6 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Jakarta State Polytechnic
  • Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles ยท bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Numerical investigation on the effect of blade count on the  performance of a small-scale Savonius wind turbine</dc:title><dc:creator>Monika, Dezetty</dc:creator><dc:creator>Muchlishah, Muchlishah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nadhiroh, Nuha</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fikri, Ahmad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Anwarrahman, Muhammad Rafi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nurhidayat, Willy</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mutiar, Mutiar</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;The growing demand for clean energy has increased interest in small-scale wind turbines, particularly vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs), which perform well in turbulent wind conditions and low wind speeds. This study numerically analyzes Savonius rotors with two, three, and four blades to evaluate their aerodynamic performance in uniform inflow. Simulations were performed with a steady-state multiple reference frame (MRF) model at an inflow velocity of 10 m/s. Key parameters used included the torque coefficient (&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐ถ๐‘‡&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;), power coefficient (&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐ถ๐‘&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;), and tip speed ratio (&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐œ†&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;). The results show a clear trade-off between configurations. The four-blade rotor produces the highest torque (0.1297 Nยทm at 950 rpm) and strong self-starting capability, although its peak efficiency (&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐ถ๐‘&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;โ‰ˆ0.60) is likely too high due to model simplification. The two-bladed rotor achieves higher efficiency (&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐ถ๐‘&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;โ‰ˆ0.24) at &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐œ†&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;โ‰ˆ0.52 but exhibits significant torque fluctuations. Conversely, the three-bladed rotor produces the lowest efficiency (&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;๐ถ๐‘&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;โ‰ˆ0.086) but offers smoother torque, beneficial for stable small-scale power generation. Flow analysis confirms this pattern: two blades cause a wide, asymmetrical wake; three blades reduce wake asymmetry with better stability; and four blades produce a compact wake but with higher drag. Overall, the optimal number of blades depends on design prioritiesโ€”efficiency, torque, or operational smoothness.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2335-2346</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2335-2346</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 16 No 5 (2026); 2335</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/41596/18907</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>