Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

A comparative analysis of hybrid FFNN-LSTM and FFNN-RNN architectures for short term electricity load forecasting

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 16 No. 5 (2026)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2347-2356
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2026-10-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Short-term accurate forecasting of electricity demand is crucial for power-system operation and energy scheduling and the equilibrium between electricity generation and consumption. The predicting of electric power consumption is however difficult because electricity-demand profiles are non-linear and time varying. In this paper, we consider two hybrid deep learning architectures feedforward neural network long short-term memory (FFNN-LSTM) and feedforward neural network recurrent neural network (FFNN-RNN) for multi-horizon electricity-load forecasting. The architectures we proposed combine the ability of FFNN to represent data non-linearly with the sequential modelling capability of LSTM and RNN. The authors assess the models based on historical electricity-load observations from Ado-Ekiti, at three different forecasting horizons of 24 hours, 72 hours, and 168 hours. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) assessed predictive performance. The findings reveal that FFNN-LSTM achieves a consistently lower RMSE across the evaluated horizons, resulting in greater effectiveness to confine relatively large forecasting errors. On the other hand, the separate LSTM and RNN models achieve lower MAE and MAPE in various scenarios, suggesting stronger short-term reaction to electricity demand. The results, therefore, show a trade-off between forecast stability and sensitivity to rapid load changes. In general, the performance of hybrid architecture is more stable compared to the standalone recurrent models which are more responsive to short-term changes when we look at most of the forecasting horizons. According to the research paper, the forecasting architectures can now be selected for smart grid applications.

Collaboration network of the authors

12 authors · 26 co-authorship links · 16 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Ekiti State University
  • Landmark University
  • Ekiti State Polytechnic
  • Federal University of Technology and Environmental Sciences
  • Federal University of Technology
  • Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Oluwumi AdetanEkiti State University1
Bankole AdebanjiEkiti State University1
Gafari Abiola AdepojuLadoke Akintola University of Technology1
Taiwo FasinaEkiti State University1
Oyinlolu Ayomidotun OdetoyeLandmark University1
Matthew Olabisi OlanrewajuLandmark University1
Adeleke Olusola AlimiLandmark University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>A comparative analysis of hybrid FFNN-LSTM and FFNN-RNN architectures for short term electricity load forecasting</dc:title><dc:creator>Akinyede, Temitope</dc:creator><dc:creator>Akinyede, Josephine Adenike</dc:creator><dc:creator>Olulope, Paul Kehinde</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fasina, Emmanuel Taiwo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Olominu, Temitope Adewale</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Short-term accurate forecasting of electricity demand is crucial for power-system operation and energy scheduling and the equilibrium between electricity generation and consumption. The predicting of electric power consumption is however difficult because electricity-demand profiles are non-linear and time varying. In this paper, we consider two hybrid deep learning architectures feedforward neural network long short-term memory (FFNN-LSTM) and feedforward neural network recurrent neural network (FFNN-RNN) for multi-horizon electricity-load forecasting. The architectures we proposed combine the ability of FFNN to represent data non-linearly with the sequential modelling capability of LSTM and RNN. The authors assess the models based on historical electricity-load observations from Ado-Ekiti, at three different forecasting horizons of 24 hours, 72 hours, and 168 hours. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) assessed predictive performance. The findings reveal that FFNN-LSTM achieves a consistently lower RMSE across the evaluated horizons, resulting in greater effectiveness to confine relatively large forecasting errors. On the other hand, the separate LSTM and RNN models achieve lower MAE and MAPE in various scenarios, suggesting stronger short-term reaction to electricity demand. The results, therefore, show a trade-off between forecast stability and sensitivity to rapid load changes. In general, the performance of hybrid architecture is more stable compared to the standalone recurrent models which are more responsive to short-term changes when we look at most of the forecasting horizons. According to the research paper, the forecasting architectures can now be selected for smart grid applications.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2347-2356</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2347-2356</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 16 No 5 (2026); 2347</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/41809/18906</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>