Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Contour-guided convexity defect geometry for precise ROI extraction in dorsal hand vein recognition

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 16 No. 5 (2026)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2622-2640
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2026-10-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Dorsal hand vein biometrics depend strongly on accurate region-of-interest (ROI) extraction, yet conventional convexity-defect-based methods remain vulnerable to contour noise, skin texture, and shadow-induced artifacts. This paper introduces contour-guided convexity defect geometry (CG-CDG), a geometry-driven ROI extraction framework in which a candidate convexity defect is accepted as an anatomical valley only if it jointly satisfies two independent criteria: chord-contour topological consistency, ensuring anatomical relevance, and a minimum enclosed-area threshold, ensuring physical plausibility. Unlike prior convexity-defect-based methods, which accept a candidate valley on the basis of a single depth- or angle-based criterion evaluated in isolation, CG-CDG applies this joint plausibility test before defining the region of interest, a square ROI centered on the hand centroid and aligned with the dominant valley orientation. Experiments on a public dorsal hand vein database of 1,024 images from 138 subjects show that, combined with HOG descriptors and City Block distance, CG-CDG achieves an equal error rate (EER) of 0.0266, with a 95% bootstrap confidence interval of [0.0241, 0.0289] over the matching scores (B = 1,000 resamples), the narrowest interval among the four ROI extraction methods compared under the primary evaluation setting. A post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction confirms that this improvement is statistically significant over all competing methods (p

Collaboration network of the authors

2 authors · 1 co-authorship link

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Université de Mostaganem
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Contour-guided convexity defect geometry for precise ROI extraction in dorsal hand vein recognition</dc:title><dc:creator>Kadem, Habib</dc:creator><dc:creator>Mostefa, Merah</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Dorsal hand vein biometrics depend strongly on accurate region-of-interest (ROI) extraction, yet conventional convexity-defect-based methods remain vulnerable to contour noise, skin texture, and shadow-induced artifacts. This paper introduces contour-guided convexity defect geometry (CG-CDG), a geometry-driven ROI extraction framework in which a candidate convexity defect is accepted as an anatomical valley only if it jointly satisfies two independent criteria: chord-contour topological consistency, ensuring anatomical relevance, and a minimum enclosed-area threshold, ensuring physical plausibility. Unlike prior convexity-defect-based methods, which accept a candidate valley on the basis of a single depth- or angle-based criterion evaluated in isolation, CG-CDG applies this joint plausibility test before defining the region of interest, a square ROI centered on the hand centroid and aligned with the dominant valley orientation. Experiments on a public dorsal hand vein database of 1,024 images from 138 subjects show that, combined with HOG descriptors and City Block distance, CG-CDG achieves an equal error rate (EER) of 0.0266, with a 95% bootstrap confidence interval of [0.0241, 0.0289] over the matching scores &#xD;
(B = 1,000 resamples), the narrowest interval among the four ROI extraction methods compared under the primary evaluation setting. A post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction confirms that this improvement is statistically significant over all competing methods (p &amp;lt; 0.001). On this dataset, geometric validation substantially reduces intra-class variance and yields statistically validated performance without requiring any training data, making CG-CDG a strong candidate both as a standalone, training-free biometric solution and as an anatomically grounded preprocessing stage for hybrid deep-learning pipelines.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2622-2640</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v16i5.pp2622-2640</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 16 No 5 (2026); 2622</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/41793/18910</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>