Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

The Evaluation QS-WFQ Scheduling Algorithm For IoT Transmission To Cloud

IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems) · Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 35–44

DOI
10.22146/ijccs.48157
ISSN
2460-7258, 1978-1520
Published
2020-01-31
Publisher
IndoCEISS in colaboration with Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study using the Weighted Fair Queue scheduling algorithm when the weights can change and calculated based on changes in the average queue size in the buffer. This algorithm divides the priorities of each sensor into three priorities, namely high, medium and low priority. Each queue is given a weight that is adjusted to the resource requirements of each traffic. High priority data will take precedence, but medium and low priority data will remain underserved and guaranteed by network resources.The results of this study show packet loss ratio when the ratio of the number of buffers and the amount of data is 1: 3 with variations in the number of high, medium and low priority buffers 75: 75: 150 and 50: 50: 200 is 0%. The delay time in the high priority and the medium priority buffer has almost the same delay time when data is transmitted, whereas for the low priority buffer increased in the delay time.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 6 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Tanjungpura University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Reza PulunganUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Muhammad Asghar NazalUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Kartika SariTanjungpura University1
Wilia SatriaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Evaluation QS-WFQ Scheduling Algorithm  For IoT Transmission To Cloud</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hasfani, Hirzen</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Riasetiawan, Mardhani</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Computer Science</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Internet of Things; Weighted Fair Queueing; Buffer; QS-WFQ</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study using the Weighted Fair Queue scheduling algorithm when the weights can change and calculated based on changes in the average queue size in the buffer. This algorithm divides the priorities of each sensor into three priorities, namely high, medium and low priority. Each queue is given a weight that is adjusted to the resource requirements of each traffic. High priority data will take precedence, but medium and low priority data will remain underserved and guaranteed by network resources.The results of this study show packet loss ratio when the ratio of the number of buffers and the amount of data is 1: 3 with variations in the number of high, medium and low priority buffers 75: 75: 150 and 50: 50: 200 is 0%. The delay time in the high priority and the medium priority buffer has almost the same delay time when data is transmitted, whereas for the low priority buffer increased in the delay time.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">IndoCEISS in colaboration with Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2020-01-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/48157</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22146/ijccs.48157</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems); Vol 14, No 1 (2020): January; 35-44</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-7258</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-1520</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/48157/26957</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>