Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Legally Binding of the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body’s Decision

Hasanuddin Law Review (HALREV) · Vol. UME (2017) · hlm. 160–174

DOI
10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1107
ISSN
2442-9899, 2442-9880
Terbit
2017-08-18
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Dispute settlement system of the WTO DSB can be categorized as a judicial dispute settlement system. Decision (rulings and recommendations) in a dispute settlement made by the WTO DSB is binding and should be performed. In some cases, decisions made by the WTO DSB were not performed, and there is no sanction against the non-compliance with the decisions. The objective of this study is to analyze the legally binding character of the WTO DSB’s decision as a decision of a judicial organ. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that the WTO does not provide adequate sanctions against the non-compliance with the DSB’s decision. It leads to the interpretation of the DSB’s decision is international soft law norm which is not legally binding. Moreover, it can hamper the enforcement of the WTO Agreement and the achievement of the WTO’s goals. The WTO judicial system should be strengthened and improved by creating WTO independent court or tribunal, which has authority to make legally binding decision as international hard law.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

26 penulis · 46 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 18 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Universidade de Díli
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
  • Islamic University of Indonesia
  • Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Aloysius WisnubrotoAtma Jaya University Yogyakarta1
Theresia Anita ChristianiAtma Jaya University Yogyakarta1
Heribertus Untung SetyardiAtma Jaya University Yogyakarta1
Hajed A. AlotaibiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University1
Chandra Puspita SariSebelas Maret University1
Seguito MonteiroUniversidade de Díli1
Sapto HermawanSebelas Maret University1
Alya Maya Khonsa RahayuSebelas Maret University1
M. SyamsudinIslamic University of Indonesia1
Musa TaklimaUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Emmy LatifahSebelas Maret University1
Rian SaputraUniversitas Slamet Riyadi1
Lego KarjokoSebelas Maret University1
M. Yazid FathoniUniversity of Mataram1
Moh. JaminAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri HariatiSebelas Maret University1
FatahullahSebelas Maret University1
Burhanudin HarahapSebelas Maret University1
Reni Budi SetianingrumMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Andi Tri HaryonoNational Dong Hwa University1
Pujiyono SuwadiSebelas Maret University1
Daniel Kristanto SitorusSebelas Maret University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Legally Binding of the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body’s Decision</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Yohanes, Triyana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sulistiyono, Adi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hawin, M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Dispute Settlement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Judicial</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Legally Binding</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">World Trade Organization</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Dispute settlement system of the WTO DSB can be categorized as a judicial dispute settlement system. Decision (rulings and recommendations) in a dispute settlement made by the WTO DSB is binding and should be performed. In some cases, decisions made by the WTO DSB were not performed, and there is no sanction against the non-compliance with the decisions. The objective of this study is to analyze the legally binding character of the WTO DSB’s decision as a decision of a judicial organ. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that the WTO does not provide adequate sanctions against the non-compliance with the DSB’s decision. It leads to the interpretation of the DSB’s decision is international soft law norm which is not legally binding. Moreover, it can hamper the enforcement of the WTO Agreement and the achievement of the WTO’s goals. The WTO judicial system should be strengthened and improved by creating WTO independent court or tribunal, which has authority to make legally binding decision as international hard law.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-08-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/1107</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1107</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Hasanuddin Law Review; VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2017; 160-174</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9899</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9880</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/1107/298</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 Hasanuddin Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>