Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Fighting the Giants: Efforts in Holding Corporation Responsible for Environmental Damages in Indonesia

Hasanuddin Law Review (HALREV) · Vol. UME (2019) · hlm. 325–338

DOI
10.20956/halrev.v4i3.1626
ISSN
2442-9899, 2442-9880
Terbit
2019-01-03
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This paper focuses on examining environmental cases before the Indonesian courts from the past ten years. To be specific, this paper will study four major cases with regard private law, six major cases with regard to criminal law, and class action cases in Indonesia. This period of time explains trending increase of environmental cases before the courts. In this regard, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) becomes the main preference of settling the environmental disputes. However, ADR seems not able to bring justice to the fullest especially when it comes to the corporations. It is not justice to the fullest in the sense that there seems no deterrence ADR brings to the corporations when the corporations do indeed damages the environment. As the environmental awareness increases and at the same time, ADR seems fail to fulfill the expectation to save the environment, another way to bring justice emerges namely through various efforts in lawsuits. Nevertheless, such lawsuits are not perfect as there are varieties of results from Indonesian courts. This paper argues that such variety of decisions have been heavily influence by the availability of scientific data and the knowledge of the panel of judges. Specifically, in the case of class action lawsuit, those who defend the environment has limitation on resources usually initiate such lawsuit. Whereas, corporation that being sued is relatively have the capacity to face the trial due to its high financial resources. Nevertheless, “fighting the giants” has been the paradigm when it comes to pursue the responsibility of corporation of its wrongdoing especially environmental damages.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

23 penulis · 37 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Indonesia
  • Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Arie AfriansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hadi Rahmat PurnamaUniversity of Indonesia2
Salsabila Siliwangi SurtiwaUniversity of Indonesia1
Topo SantosoUniversity of Indonesia1
Febby Mutiara NelsonUniversity of Indonesia1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia1
Bintang Wicaksono AjieUniversity of Indonesia1
Sakina FakhriahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sakina FakhriahUniversity of Indonesia1
M. Ikhsan LapadenganAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Ikhsan LapadenganUniversity of Indonesia1
Mutiara WindraskinasihUniversity of Indonesia1
Rizky Banyualam PermanaUniversity of Indonesia1
Rizka IswaraUniversity of Indonesia1
Gledys Deyana WahyudinUniversity of Indonesia1
Igor YosoUniversity of Indonesia1
Ananda Kurniawan SukarmajiUniversity of Indonesia1
Akbar Kurnia PutraUniversitas Jambi1
Yetty Komalasari DewiUniversity of Indonesia1
Elisabeth ArdiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Fighting the Giants: Efforts in Holding Corporation Responsible for Environmental Damages in Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Afriansyah, Arie</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Jayadi, Anbar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Vania, Angela</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Corporate Liability</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Environmental Damage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Court Decision</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This paper focuses on examining environmental cases before the Indonesian courts from the past ten years. To be specific, this paper will study four major cases with regard private law, six major cases with regard to criminal law, and class action cases in Indonesia. This period of time explains trending increase of environmental cases before the courts. In this regard, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) becomes the main preference of settling the environmental disputes. However, ADR seems not able to bring justice to the fullest especially when it comes to the corporations. It is not justice to the fullest in the sense that there seems no deterrence ADR brings to the corporations when the corporations do indeed damages the environment. As the environmental awareness increases and at the same time, ADR seems fail to fulfill the expectation to save the environment, another way to bring justice emerges namely through various efforts in lawsuits. Nevertheless, such lawsuits are not perfect as there are varieties of results from Indonesian courts. This paper argues that such variety of decisions have been heavily influence by the availability of scientific data and the knowledge of the panel of judges. Specifically, in the case of class action lawsuit, those who defend the environment has limitation on resources usually initiate such lawsuit. Whereas, corporation that being sued is relatively have the capacity to face the trial due to its high financial resources. Nevertheless, “fighting the giants” has been the paradigm when it comes to pursue the responsibility of corporation of its wrongdoing especially environmental damages.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-01-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/1626</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20956/halrev.v4i3.1626</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Hasanuddin Law Review; VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018; 325-338</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9899</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9880</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/1626/435</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Hasanuddin Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>