Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Justice Delayed, Justice Denied: A Critical Examination of Repeated Suspect Status in Indonesia

Hasanuddin Law Review (HALREV) · Vol. UME (2024) · hlm. 342–357

DOI
10.20956/halrev.v10i3.6088
ISSN
2442-9899, 2442-9880
Terbit
2024-12-12
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces critical issues with the repeated designation of individuals as suspects, which compromises legal certainty and the protection of human rights. This study provides a critical analysis of the procedural and ethical consequences of repeated suspect designations within the framework of Indonesia's Criminal Procedure Code. This study employs a doctrinal legal research methodology, incorporating statute, case and conceptual approaches. The results show that pretrial judges assess the validity of suspect designations based on procedural and formal principles. Their authority is confined to reviewing formal aspects. These limitations underscore that pretrial proceedings focus solely on administrative and procedural compliance rather than the substantive merits of the case. This formalist perspective follows civil procedural principles, emphasizing procedural correctness over material truth. While pretrial judges can annul a suspect designation, investigators can re-designate the person as a suspect if new evidence is presented. Such a reform would ensure a more balanced relationship between judicial oversight and investigative authority, minimizing arbitrary practices and enhancing procedural fairness. However, the recurring practice of re-designating suspects raises a significant flaw in the system, undermining legal certainty and eroding public trust.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 71 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Salma HayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Darmawan DarmawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dharma Setiawan NegaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad RidhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Abdullah AbdullahUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare2
Dahlan AliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Musliadi bin UsmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
M Adli AbdullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hasbi AliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rizanizarli RizanizarliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Joel NiyobuhungiroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahman RahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arwan ArwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfahmi AlwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suhayib SuhayibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amrullah AmrullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ilyas IsmailAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Chalis M.ChalisAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sulaiman SulaimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mujibussalim MujibussalimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eli Dani IsmaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Efendi EfendiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Fachrurrazi IdramAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali AbubakarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bagus SujatmikoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Karell Mawla Ibnu KamaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aulia RahmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mukhlisah MukhlisahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safriana SafrianaUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Maimunah MaimunahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M Alfi SyahrilAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syeh DillyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fajriah FajriahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Uci HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
T. Fadlon MegaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Raihanil PhonnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Justice Delayed, Justice Denied: A Critical Examination of Repeated Suspect Status in Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Susilo, Erwin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Din, Mohd.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suhaimi, Suhaimi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Criminal Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Legal Certainty</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Prosecutor</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Pretrial</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Repeated Suspect</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The Indonesian criminal justice system faces critical issues with the repeated designation of individuals as suspects, which compromises legal certainty and the protection of human rights. This study provides a critical analysis of the procedural and ethical consequences of repeated suspect designations within the framework of Indonesia's Criminal Procedure Code. This study employs a doctrinal legal research methodology, incorporating statute, case and conceptual approaches. The results show that pretrial judges assess the validity of suspect designations based on procedural and formal principles. Their authority is confined to reviewing formal aspects. These limitations underscore that pretrial proceedings focus solely on administrative and procedural compliance rather than the substantive merits of the case. This formalist perspective follows civil procedural principles, emphasizing procedural correctness over material truth. While pretrial judges can annul a suspect designation, investigators can re-designate the person as a suspect if new evidence is presented. Such a reform would ensure a more balanced relationship between judicial oversight and investigative authority, minimizing arbitrary practices and enhancing procedural fairness. However, the recurring practice of re-designating suspects raises a significant flaw in the system, undermining legal certainty and eroding public trust.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-12-12</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/6088</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20956/halrev.v10i3.6088</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Hasanuddin Law Review; VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2024; 342-357</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9899</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9880</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/6088/1028</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Hasanuddin Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>