Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Otokratisasi dan Populisme Otoriter dalam Rezim Demokrasi: Perbandingan antara India, Hongaria, dan Turki

JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 263–300

DOI
10.15575/jispo.v11i2.13868
ISSN
2579-3098, 2303-3169
Terbit
2022-02-06
Penerbit
Faculty of SociaI and Political Sciences (FISIP), Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Bandung
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Democracy decline undermines optimism for the expansion of world’s democracy as it occurred in established democracies. The decline from democratic to autocratic regime or “autocratization” is being experienced by India (the world’s largest democracy), Hungary (the established democracy in the European Union), and Turkey (the influential democracy in the Muslim world). Although they have different views of the main causes of the democracy decline, experts agree that authoritarian tendency driven by autocratic leaders erodes democratic values. The autocratization in the above three democracies is strongly related to “authoritarian populism” adopted by the incumbents and reflected on their antagonistic attitudes towards democracy. This article compares the role of anti-democratic populism in India, Hungary, and Turkey in the process of autocratizing democracies in the last decade. Autocratization in which authoritarian populism plays a significant role occurs through the “autocratization stages” as follows: the politicization of people’s disappointment, social polarization based on cultural narratives, weakening of democratic institutions, control of alternative information, and repression of opposition and critics. The article concludes that as seen in the cases of India, Hungary and Turkey, autocratization is highly dependent on the incumbents' skill in exploiting populist rhetoric to legitimize the regime's authoritarian actions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

Belum ada rekan penulis di Melola.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jispo/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Otokratisasi dan Populisme Otoriter dalam Rezim Demokrasi: Perbandingan antara India, Hongaria, dan Turki</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Margiansyah, Defbry</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Otoritarianisme</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Otokratisasi</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Kemunduran Demokrasi</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Populisme</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Democracy decline undermines optimism for the expansion of world’s democracy as it occurred in established democracies. The decline from democratic to autocratic regime or “autocratization” is being experienced by India (the world’s largest democracy), Hungary (the established democracy in the European Union), and Turkey (the influential democracy in the Muslim world). Although they have different views of the main causes of the democracy decline, experts agree that authoritarian tendency driven by autocratic leaders erodes democratic values. The autocratization in the above three democracies is strongly related to “authoritarian populism” adopted by the incumbents and reflected on their antagonistic attitudes towards democracy. This article compares the role of anti-democratic populism in India, Hungary, and Turkey in the process of autocratizing democracies in the last decade. Autocratization in which authoritarian populism plays a significant role occurs through the “autocratization stages” as follows: the politicization of people’s disappointment, social polarization based on cultural narratives, weakening of democratic institutions, control of alternative information, and repression of opposition and critics. The article concludes that as seen in the cases of India, Hungary and Turkey, autocratization is highly dependent on the incumbents' skill in exploiting populist rhetoric to legitimize the regime's authoritarian actions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of SociaI and Political Sciences (FISIP), Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Bandung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-02-06</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jispo/article/view/13868</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15575/jispo.v11i2.13868</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2021): JISPO Vol 11 No 2 2021; 263-300</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id-ID">JISPO : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik; Vol 11 No 2 (2021): JISPO Vol 11 No 2 2021; 263-300</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2579-3098</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2303-3169</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jispo/article/view/13868/6768</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Defbry Margiansyah</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>