Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Ethical Dimensions of Market Mechanisms: A Comparative Study of Conventional and Islamic Economics

OIKOS · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2012) · hlm. 93–108

Terbit
2012-12-31
Penerbit
OIKOS
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This article presents a comparative analysis of market mechanisms in conventional and Islamic economic frameworks, examining their underlying principles, regulatory structures, and ethical implications. Using a qualitative, doctrinal approach grounded in authoritative academic sources, the study explores how each system defines price formation, market behavior, and regulation. While conventional economics emphasizes supply-demand dynamics and market equilibrium under rational self-interest, Islamic economics embeds economic activity within a divine ethical framework, guided by values such as ʿadl (justice), ḥisbah (market supervision), and the prohibition of ribā (usury). The findings highlight that Islamic market mechanisms offer a value-oriented model that addresses the limitations of conventional markets—particularly in terms of inequality, moral hazard, and social responsibility. Through institutions like zakāh, ḥisbah, and ethical trade rules, Islamic economics advances a holistic model integrating economic efficiency with moral accountability. The study contributes to theoretical discourse by proposing a structured comparative framework and offers practical pathways for ethical market governance. Implications include the potential for Islamic market principles to inspire new regulatory models in both Muslim-majority and pluralistic economic contexts.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

33 penulis · 88 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 34 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Kemandirian Nusantara
  • Satya Wacana Christian University
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung
  • Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • State University of Jakarta
  • STMIK IKMI Cirebon
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Aryasatya Abdie MaheswaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hindriyanto Dwi PurnomoSatya Wacana Christian University1
Irwan SembiringSatya Wacana Christian University1
Danny ManonggaSatya Wacana Christian University1
Ahmad FauziSTMIK IKMI Cirebon1
Baenil HudaSatya Wacana Christian University1
Hendry HendrySatya Wacana Christian University1
April Lia HanantoUniversitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang1
Tukino TukinoUniversitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang1
Dini widianingrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tuti WidjastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Asep AnangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tazkia KhaerunnisaPadjadjaran University1
Lucyana TrimoPadjadjaran University1
Gema Wibawa MuktiPadjadjaran University1
SujarwoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Taufik RihatnoState University of Jakarta1
Elma Maulida WardhanaState University of Jakarta1
Rani MulyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad ZakySunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Dudang GojaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusef YakubiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yulia Fithriany RahmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri WahyuningsihInstitut Kemandirian Nusantara1
Jumanah JumanahInstitut Kemandirian Nusantara1
Julizar IdrisInstitut Kemandirian Nusantara1
Anita TinaInstitut Kemandirian Nusantara1
Ficka Yulia BadariyahInstitut Kemandirian Nusantara1
Abdulah SafeiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tajul ArifinSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Usep SaepullahSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Dzul RachmanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/oikos/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Ethical Dimensions of Market Mechanisms: A Comparative Study of Conventional and Islamic Economics</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Setiawan, Iwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This article presents a comparative analysis of market mechanisms in conventional and Islamic economic frameworks, examining their underlying principles, regulatory structures, and ethical implications. Using a qualitative, doctrinal approach grounded in authoritative academic sources, the study explores how each system defines price formation, market behavior, and regulation. While conventional economics emphasizes supply-demand dynamics and market equilibrium under rational self-interest, Islamic economics embeds economic activity within a divine ethical framework, guided by values such as ʿadl (justice), ḥisbah (market supervision), and the prohibition of ribā (usury). The findings highlight that Islamic market mechanisms offer a value-oriented model that addresses the limitations of conventional markets—particularly in terms of inequality, moral hazard, and social responsibility. Through institutions like zakāh, ḥisbah, and ethical trade rules, Islamic economics advances a holistic model integrating economic efficiency with moral accountability. The study contributes to theoretical discourse by proposing a structured comparative framework and offers practical pathways for ethical market governance. Implications include the potential for Islamic market principles to inspire new regulatory models in both Muslim-majority and pluralistic economic contexts.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">OIKOS</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2012-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/oikos/article/view/47025</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">OIKOS; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2012): OIKOS: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Bisnis; 93-108</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/oikos/article/view/47025/14450</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>