Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Practice of Village Governance: Comparing traditional form of Desa and Cultural Form of Nagari

Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 1–12

DOI
10.15575/jpan.v13i1.12470
ISSN
2715-9256, 2085-6555
Terbit
2021-06-30
Penerbit
Department of Public Administration
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Indonesia has been implementing a more in-depth decentralization system encouraging village governance since 2014. Since then, village governments have been given more autonomy on governing village funds to promote village development further. This paper aims to compare two forms of the Village (desa and nagari) in terms of the practice of village governance. This study mainly uses a qualitative descriptive method to compare the implementation of village governance in both traditional form (desa) and cultural form (nagari). With further Lowndes and Sullivan’s analytical framework of neighbourhood governance, this study suggests all types of neighbourhood governance have been practiced in both forms. Although village government type is more significant in both forms, the social rationale is more significant in nagari because of the cultural aspect. Finally, based on the comparison of both forms of Village, this paper advocates some implications in the implementation of village governance.Â

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

4 penulis · 6 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 5 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Walisongo State Islamic University
  • State University of Gorontalo
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Juliana JulianaState University of Gorontalo1
Silahuddin SilahuddinUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
TM ZulfikarUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/publica/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Practice of Village Governance: Comparing traditional form of Desa and Cultural Form of Nagari</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Muhammad, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">village governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">desa</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">nagari</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">neighborhood governance</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia has been implementing a more in-depth decentralization system encouraging village governance since 2014. Since then, village governments have been given more autonomy on governing village funds to promote village development further. This paper aims to compare two forms of the Village (desa and nagari) in terms of the practice of village governance. This study mainly uses a qualitative descriptive method to compare the implementation of village governance in both traditional form (desa) and cultural form (nagari). With further Lowndes and Sullivan’s analytical framework of neighbourhood governance, this study suggests all types of neighbourhood governance have been practiced in both forms. Although village government type is more significant in both forms, the social rationale is more significant in nagari because of the cultural aspect. Finally, based on the comparison of both forms of Village, this paper advocates some implications in the implementation of village governance. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Public Administration</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/publica/article/view/12470</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15575/jpan.v13i1.12470</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Pemikiran Administrasi Negara-1; 1-12</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-9256</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2085-6555</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15575/jpan.v13i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/publica/article/view/12470/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Muhammad Muhammad</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>