Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

DSS for Keyboard Mechanical Selection Using AHP and Profile Matching Method

IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems) · Vol. 15 No. 4 (2021) · pp. 369–378

DOI
10.22146/ijccs.67813
ISSN
2460-7258, 1978-1520
Published
2021-10-31
Publisher
IndoCEISS in colaboration with Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Mechanical keyboards are designed with various shapes, variations, and specifications that are different from other types of keyboards. The mechanical keyboard itself has an aesthetic function that allows users to customize it. There are various specifications on mechanical keyboards, causing various considerations, which can make it difficult for users to choose a mechanical keyboard that fits the desired criteria. Supported by observations in the Indonesia Mechanical Keyboard Group (IMKG), some users are still limited in their knowledge of mechanical keyboard products available in Indonesia, also, currently there is no solution that can handle this problem.Based on these problems, in this research, an DSS is built that can help overcome these problems, by providing recommendations for a mechanical keyboard according to the wishes of the user. DSS is implemented in web form using the AHP method for the weighting process and Profile Matching for the scoring process. The criteria used are determined by conducting a survey regarding the specifications that are the priority considerations in choosing a mechanical keyboard.At the end of the study, the DSS that was successfully built was able to provide mechanical keyboard priority recommendations according to user preferences and get an average evaluation result of 36.17 out of a total maximum value of 40.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 54 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Udayana University
  • Institut Teknologi dan Sains Mandala
  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Politeknik Gorontalo
  • Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sri T. HartatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada6
Aina MusdholifahUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Edi WinarkoUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Khabib MustofaUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Edhy SutantaUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Agus HarjokoUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Rahmat BudiarsaUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Bangun WijayantoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Decky HendarsyahUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Awaluddin AwaluddinAffiliation unknown1
Putri Elfa Mas’udiaAffiliation unknown1
Rina PramitasariUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Albert Dian SanoAffiliation unknown1
Abdul WahidInstitut Teknologi dan Sains Mandala1
Nur HasanahAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Munawar YusroJenderal Soedirman University1
Muhammad FakhrurrifqiAffiliation unknown1
Peggi Sri AstutiUdayana University1
Rahman EramaPoliteknik Gorontalo1
Christian Dwi SuhendraUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Nola RithaUniversitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji1
Ria AstriratmaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Made Arya BudhiAffiliation unknown1
Elizabeth Paskahlia GunawanAffiliation unknown1
Ulfi Saidata AesyiAffiliation unknown1
Anny Kartika SariUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ida Bagus Gede SarasvanandaUdayana University1
Indra PratisthaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Beta Yudha MahindartaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Dian MustikaningrumUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Susilo RomadhonUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Muhammad MukharirUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Nikolas Adhi PrasetyoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Susi Eva Maria PurbaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Kharis Suryandaru PratamaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ahmad AshariUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Bernard Renaldy SutejaAffiliation unknown1
Suryo GuritnoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">DSS for Keyboard Mechanical Selection Using AHP and Profile Matching Method</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Handayani, Amelia Dita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wardoyo, Retantyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Computer Science</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Decision Support System;AHP;Profile Matching;Mechanical Keyboard</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Mechanical keyboards are designed with various shapes, variations, and specifications that are different from other types of keyboards. The mechanical keyboard itself has an aesthetic function that allows users to customize it. There are various specifications on mechanical keyboards, causing various considerations, which can make it difficult for users to choose a mechanical keyboard that fits the desired criteria. Supported by observations in the Indonesia Mechanical Keyboard Group (IMKG), some users are still limited in their knowledge of mechanical keyboard products available in Indonesia, also, currently there is no solution that can handle this problem.Based on these problems, in this research, an DSS is built that can help overcome these problems, by providing recommendations for a mechanical keyboard according to the wishes of the user. DSS is implemented in web form using the AHP method for the weighting process and Profile Matching for the scoring process. The criteria used are determined by conducting a survey regarding the specifications that are the priority considerations in choosing a mechanical keyboard.At the end of the study, the DSS that was successfully built was able to provide mechanical keyboard priority recommendations according to user preferences and get an average evaluation result of 36.17 out of a total maximum value of 40.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">IndoCEISS in colaboration with Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2021-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/67813</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22146/ijccs.67813</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems); Vol 15, No 4 (2021): October; 369-378</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-7258</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-1520</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/67813/32407</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>