Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Why Was “Self-Government” Not Achieved in Aceh? The Challenges of Implementing a Peace Agreement

Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022) · hlm. 875–898

DOI
10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.789
ISSN
2443-2067, 2338-8617
Terbit
2022-09-30
Penerbit
SCAD Independent
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The "self-government" was proposed as an alternative solution to independence and special autonomy to end the protracted conflict in Aceh. Based on the contents of the peace agreement signed in 2005, Aceh is given the right to self-government. However, this is not realized fully. This study aimed to explain the imagined self-government and the causes challenging it to be implemented. The study used a qualitative library research method in which data was sourced from online text documents. The data were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. The study found that the issue of "self-government" was initially at the center of the negotiation. The Free Aceh Movement - GAM envisioned it like Olan Island in Finland and Sarawak in Malaysia. Still, it has not been realized because it was not declared explicitly in the agreement, and the term "self-government" was used as a strategy to persuade GAM negotiators to continue in the negotiation. Further, the Government of Indonesia (GoI) offered Aceh special autonomy instead of self-government through the Law on Governing Aceh by ignoring the limitations on the authority of GoI over Aceh that was agreed. This was caused by five reasons that lay in the negotiation process and the realization of the agreement interconnected. Amongst; GAM was unbalanced to GoI during the negotiations and powerless to force GoI to obey the deal, and there was no punishment mechanism for the violator of the agreement. Finally, the study revealed that an inclusive process in drafting new laws for a post-conflict region does not always result in full outcomes by the agreement.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

15 penulis · 28 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yusra JamaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Anggung Manumanoso PrasetyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Che Mohd Aziz YaacobAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fakhrurrazi FakhrurraziAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iromi IlhamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Awaludin ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faizul AuliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Marhaeni SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahmawati RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abidin NurdinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alchaidar AlchaidarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Apridar ApridarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Why Was “Self-Government” Not Achieved in Aceh? The Challenges of Implementing a Peace Agreement</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Zainal, Suadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Askandar, Kamarulzaman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Abubakar, Muhammad bin</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Peace Agreement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Self-Government</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Helsinki MoU</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Aceh</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sosial Sciences</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The "self-government" was proposed as an alternative solution to independence and special autonomy to end the protracted conflict in Aceh. Based on the contents of the peace agreement signed in 2005, Aceh is given the right to self-government. However, this is not realized fully. This study aimed to explain the imagined self-government and the causes challenging it to be implemented. The study used a qualitative library research method in which data was sourced from online text documents. The data were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. The study found that the issue of "self-government" was initially at the center of the negotiation. The Free Aceh Movement - GAM envisioned it like Olan Island in Finland and Sarawak in Malaysia. Still, it has not been realized because it was not declared explicitly in the agreement, and the term "self-government" was used as a strategy to persuade GAM negotiators to continue in the negotiation. Further, the Government of Indonesia (GoI) offered Aceh special autonomy instead of self-government through the Law on Governing Aceh by ignoring the limitations on the authority of GoI over Aceh that was agreed. This was caused by five reasons that lay in the negotiation process and the realization of the agreement interconnected. Amongst; GAM was unbalanced to GoI during the negotiations and powerless to force GoI to obey the deal, and there was no punishment mechanism for the violator of the agreement. Finally, the study revealed that an inclusive process in drafting new laws for a post-conflict region does not always result in full outcomes by the agreement.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">SCAD Independent</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/789</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.789</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun; 875-898</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2443-2067</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2338-8617</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/789/660</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/789/661</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Suadi Zainal, Kamarulzaman Askandar, Muhammad bin Abubakar (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>