Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Human-Mediated AI in Educational Management: Authority, Ethics, and Accountability

Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun · Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026) · hlm. 2167–2188

DOI
10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2706
ISSN
2443-2067, 2338-8617
Terbit
2026-09-30
Penerbit
SCAD Independent
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to support educational management, yet limited empirical attention has been paid to how managers retain authority when AI-generated information enters consequential decisions. This study analyzed how educational managers interpreted, verified, accepted, modified, or rejected AI-generated recommendations while maintaining human agency, professional responsibility, contextual discretion, and ethical judgement. An interpretive qualitative multiple-case study was conducted in three public junior secondary schools in Pidie Regency, Aceh, involving 14 adult institutional actors. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and institutional documents and analyzed thematically within-case and cross-case comparisons. The findings showed that AI functioned as decision support rather than as an autonomous decision-maker. Its outputs acquired managerial relevance through four interconnected forms of human mediation: interpretation, verification, contextualization, and intervention through acceptance, supplementation, modification, or rejection. Human responsibility remained identifiable because school personnel retained authority over the evidentiary and contextual suitability of AI outputs. The study refines human-mediated algorithmic management as a process-oriented account of meaningful human control and highlights the need for institutional procedures that document verification, contextual considerations, and reasons for using or altering AI-generated information.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

27 penulis · 66 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 8 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • STKIP Kusuma Negara
  • Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Universitas Pamulang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Timur
  • State University of Makassar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Samingan SaminganAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad Awin AlabySTKIP Kusuma Negara1
Sri Rosmalina SoejonoUniversitas Esa Unggul1
Mas Fierna Janvierna Lusie PutriUniversitas Pamulang1
Nur RahmahUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Timur1
Hasanuddin HasanuddinState University of Makassar1
Asiah AsiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Devi SyafriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kaisah Ghufrani IskandarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safrida SafridaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhibbuddin MuhibbuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuli Heirina HamidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rivan RinaldiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andi Ulfa Tenri PadaUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Tara Raudhatul JannahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suhartono SuhartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faisal AbdurrahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Othman Othman OmarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wiwit ArtikaUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Samsul KamalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismul HudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Ali SarongAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nadia AldyzaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Teguh SantosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad SayuthiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Human-Mediated AI in Educational Management: Authority, Ethics, and Accountability</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Iriansyah, Herinto Sidik </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Iswadi, Iswadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Human-Mediated Algorithmic Management</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Human-Centered AI</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Educational Management</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Professional Discretion</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Algorithmic Accountability</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social Sciences (miscellaneous)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Art and Humanities (miscellaneous)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Education</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to support educational management, yet limited empirical attention has been paid to how managers retain authority when AI-generated information enters consequential decisions. This study analyzed how educational managers interpreted, verified, accepted, modified, or rejected AI-generated recommendations while maintaining human agency, professional responsibility, contextual discretion, and ethical judgement. An interpretive qualitative multiple-case study was conducted in three public junior secondary schools in Pidie Regency, Aceh, involving 14 adult institutional actors. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and institutional documents and analyzed thematically within-case and cross-case comparisons. The findings showed that AI functioned as decision support rather than as an autonomous decision-maker. Its outputs acquired managerial relevance through four interconnected forms of human mediation: interpretation, verification, contextualization, and intervention through acceptance, supplementation, modification, or rejection. Human responsibility remained identifiable because school personnel retained authority over the evidentiary and contextual suitability of AI outputs. The study refines human-mediated algorithmic management as a process-oriented account of meaningful human control and highlights the need for institutional procedures that document verification, contextual considerations, and reasons for using or altering AI-generated information.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">SCAD Independent</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2706</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2706</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun; 2167-2188</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2443-2067</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2338-8617</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2706/1330</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2706/1335</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Herinto Sidik  Iriansyah, Iswadi Iswadi (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>