Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Balancing Digital Justice and Individual Rights: Comparative Criminal Court Transformation in Indonesia and Uzbekistan

Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun · Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026) · hlm. 1655–1680

DOI
10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2911
ISSN
2443-2067, 2338-8617
Terbit
2026-09-30
Penerbit
SCAD Independent
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The rapid digitalisation of criminal justice promises greater efficiency and accessibility but also creates procedural risks when technological innovation outpaces safeguards for individual rights. Despite expanding scholarship on digital courts, comparative evidence remains limited on how different institutional trajectories shape the relationship between judicial technology and procedural protection in emerging Asian legal systems. This study examines how digital criminal proceedings affect individual rights in Indonesia and Uzbekistan and identifies the institutional conditions required for rights-sensitive digital justice. Using a qualitative comparative socio-legal design, the study analyses legislation, judicial and policy documents, official materials, and relevant scholarly literature through thematic content analysis and structured comparison. The findings reveal contrasting trajectories: Indonesia combines relatively established digital judicial infrastructure with fragmented criminal-specific regulation, whereas Uzbekistan pursues a more centrally coordinated Digital Court transformation while procedural safeguards continue to evolve. Across both systems, electronic evidence, remote hearings, digital case management, and AI-assisted tools generate efficiency and transparency gains but also risks concerning evidentiary reliability, meaningful participation, digital inequality, and human oversight. The study conceptualises this mismatch as institutional asynchrony, providing a comparative framework for designing accountable, contestable, and rights-sensitive digital justice beyond technologically consolidated jurisdictions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

4 penulis · 6 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 2 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Tashkent State University of Law
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Balancing Digital Justice and Individual Rights: Comparative Criminal Court Transformation in Indonesia and Uzbekistan</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rustamaji, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Shamsutdinov, Behruz</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Bazarova, Dildora </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Jaelani, Abdul Kadir</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Digital Criminal Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Institutional Asynchrony</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Individual Rights</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Judicial Digitalisation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Socio-Legal Comparison</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Art and Humanities (miscellaneous)</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Social Sciences (miscellaneous)</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The rapid digitalisation of criminal justice promises greater efficiency and accessibility but also creates procedural risks when technological innovation outpaces safeguards for individual rights. Despite expanding scholarship on digital courts, comparative evidence remains limited on how different institutional trajectories shape the relationship between judicial technology and procedural protection in emerging Asian legal systems. This study examines how digital criminal proceedings affect individual rights in Indonesia and Uzbekistan and identifies the institutional conditions required for rights-sensitive digital justice. Using a qualitative comparative socio-legal design, the study analyses legislation, judicial and policy documents, official materials, and relevant scholarly literature through thematic content analysis and structured comparison. The findings reveal contrasting trajectories: Indonesia combines relatively established digital judicial infrastructure with fragmented criminal-specific regulation, whereas Uzbekistan pursues a more centrally coordinated Digital Court transformation while procedural safeguards continue to evolve. Across both systems, electronic evidence, remote hearings, digital case management, and AI-assisted tools generate efficiency and transparency gains but also risks concerning evidentiary reliability, meaningful participation, digital inequality, and human oversight. The study conceptualises this mismatch as institutional asynchrony, providing a comparative framework for designing accountable, contestable, and rights-sensitive digital justice beyond technologically consolidated jurisdictions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">SCAD Independent</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2911</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.26811/peuradeun.v14i3.2911</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun; 1655-1680</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2443-2067</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2338-8617</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2911/1292</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2911/1293</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Rustamaji, Behruz Shamsutdinov, Dildora  Bazarova, Abdul Kadir Jaelani (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>