Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

KEWENANGAN KOMISI PEMBERANTAS KORUPSI DALAM MELAKUKAN PENUNTUTAN MONEY LAUNDERING

JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) · Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 117–135

DOI
10.31958/juris.v17i1.1004
ISSN
2580-2763, 1412-6109
Terbit
2018-06-30
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Abstrak

The tackling of money laundering through the criminal Justice System has not been debatable as long as it is handled by sub-systems in the criminal justice system such as the police and prosecutors since they have been bestowed a clear mandate in law. That raised a question, what about Corruption Eradication Commission or KPK?┬á In Article 6 letter C Act no.30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (Law of KPK) explicitly and clearly revealed that the KPK has a duty to conduct the initial investigation, investigation and prosecution of corruption. That article also did not provide the further explanation. For that reason, the authority of KPK in conducting initial investigation, investigation and prosecution is only regarding the criminal act of corruption.In several corruption cases settling, KPK also often tried to apprehend the perpetrators through the law of prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crime. Many People criticized KPK but some gave the appreciation on KPKÔÇÖs efforts in asset recovery. That was also addressed to KPK on itsÔÇÖ authority in investigating and prosecuting TPPU. In the case of No. 39/Pid.Sus/ TPK/2013/PN.Jkt.Pst with the accused Ahmad Fathanah, Joko Subagion and I made Hendra as 2 (two) members of the judgesÔÇÖ panel stated dissenting opinion. It declared that KPK has the authority to investigate TPU but it is only concerning with the wealth which is suspected from a criminal act of corruption. Actually, the authority to persecute TPPU is on the general attorney. Meanwhile, persecutors of KPK does not have the right to file the indicment and demand of the TPPU. Therefore, the indictment related to money laundering should be declared unacceptable. It brings the writerÔÇÖs unrest on the criminal law enforcementÔÇÖs practice. It is especially in the eradication of money laundering since it is supposed that law enforcement does no provide justice for justicia belene, certainty and expediency in asset recovery.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

7 penulis · 13 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 9 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
  • Andalas University
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • King Saud University
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad FarhanUniversitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar1
Eficandra EficandraUniversitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar1
Kasmuri KasmuriUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau1
Khairina KhairinaUniversitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar1
Khairani KhairaniAndalas University1
Okky AfriantoKing Saud University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">KEWENANGAN KOMISI PEMBERANTAS KORUPSI DALAM MELAKUKAN PENUNTUTAN MONEY LAUNDERING</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Efendi, Roni</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">money laundering</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">penuntutan</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The tackling of money laundering through the criminal Justice System has not been debatable as long as it is handled by sub-systems in the criminal justice system such as the police and prosecutors since they have been bestowed a clear mandate in law. That raised a question, what about Corruption Eradication Commission or KPK?┬á In Article 6 letter C Act no.30 of 2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (Law of KPK) explicitly and clearly revealed that the KPK has a duty to conduct the initial investigation, investigation and prosecution of corruption. That article also did not provide the further explanation. For that reason, the authority of KPK in conducting initial investigation, investigation and prosecution is only regarding the criminal act of corruption.In several corruption cases settling, KPK also often tried to apprehend the perpetrators through the law of prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crime. Many People criticized KPK but some gave the appreciation on KPKÔÇÖs efforts in asset recovery. That was also addressed to KPK on itsÔÇÖ authority in investigating and prosecuting TPPU. In the case of No. 39/Pid.Sus/ TPK/2013/PN.Jkt.Pst with the accused Ahmad Fathanah, Joko Subagion and I made Hendra as 2 (two) members of the judgesÔÇÖ panel stated dissenting opinion. It declared that KPK has the authority to investigate TPU but it is only concerning with the wealth which is suspected from a criminal act of corruption. Actually, the authority to persecute TPPU is on the general attorney. Meanwhile, persecutors of KPK does not have the right to file the indicment and demand of the TPPU. Therefore, the indictment related to money laundering should be declared unacceptable. It brings the writerÔÇÖs unrest on the criminal law enforcementÔÇÖs practice. It is especially in the eradication of money laundering since it is supposed that law enforcement does no provide justice for justicia belene, certainty and expediency in asset recovery.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/1004</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31958/juris.v17i1.1004</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah); Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018); 117-135</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Juris; Vol 17 No 1 (2018); 117-135</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2763</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1412-6109</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.31958/juris.v17i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/1004/940</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2018 Roni Efendi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>