Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Moral Agency under Legal Precarity: Islamic Ethical Resilience among Indonesian Muslim Women Migrant Workers in Taiwan

JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) · Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 369–380

DOI
10.31958/juris.v24i2.16348
ISSN
2580-2763, 1412-6109
Terbit
2025-12-28
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Indonesian Muslim women constitute a major segment of the migrant domestic workforce in Taiwan, where secular labor regulations offer limited accommodation for workers’ moral and religious needs. Moving beyond dominant accounts that frame migrant women primarily as legally vulnerable subjects, this study examines how Indonesian Muslim women migrant workers actively negotiate Islamic ethical commitments—particularly marital fidelity—as forms of everyday moral agency under conditions of legal and social precarity. Based on qualitative in-depth interviews with six Indonesian Muslim women employed in Taiwan, the study employs an integrated analytical framework combining emotional geography and systemic functional linguistic transitivity analysis. This approach enables a detailed examination of how moral agency is spatially enacted across domestic, workplace, public, and digital environments, and how agency, responsibility, and self-discipline are linguistically constructed in participants’ narratives. The findings demonstrate that participants engage in diverse strategies, including spatial avoidance, religious dress practices, peer-based moral regulation, ritualized religious observance, and digital religious engagement. These practices function not as passive adherence to religious norms but as active, situationally negotiated forms of ethical resilience. The study’s primary contribution lies in conceptualizing Islamic ethical practice as a form of lived legal consciousness that operates alongside—and at times compensates for—the limitations of state law in transnational labor regimes. By foregrounding moral agency rather than victimhood, this study advances socio-legal debates on migrant precarity and offers a novel framework for understanding religion as an agentive resource within migration governance. Practically, it underscores the need for culturally and religiously responsive mechanisms in migrant protection policies beyond state-centric legal interventions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

10 penulis · 19 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muh. Asharif SulemanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfi IdayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Basri BasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad Hasan RidwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad HasanuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Moral Agency under Legal Precarity: Islamic Ethical Resilience among Indonesian Muslim Women Migrant Workers in Taiwan</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Guspita, Devika Rosa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ma’mun, Muflih </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hilmi, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ghozali, Mohamad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hastowohadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Moral Agency</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Consciousness</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Migrant Domestic Workers</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en"> Islamic Ethics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Emotional Geography</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Indonesian Muslim women constitute a major segment of the migrant domestic workforce in Taiwan, where secular labor regulations offer limited accommodation for workers’ moral and religious needs. Moving beyond dominant accounts that frame migrant women primarily as legally vulnerable subjects, this study examines how Indonesian Muslim women migrant workers actively negotiate Islamic ethical commitments—particularly marital fidelity—as forms of everyday moral agency under conditions of legal and social precarity. Based on qualitative in-depth interviews with six Indonesian Muslim women employed in Taiwan, the study employs an integrated analytical framework combining emotional geography and systemic functional linguistic transitivity analysis. This approach enables a detailed examination of how moral agency is spatially enacted across domestic, workplace, public, and digital environments, and how agency, responsibility, and self-discipline are linguistically constructed in participants’ narratives. The findings demonstrate that participants engage in diverse strategies, including spatial avoidance, religious dress practices, peer-based moral regulation, ritualized religious observance, and digital religious engagement. These practices function not as passive adherence to religious norms but as active, situationally negotiated forms of ethical resilience. The study’s primary contribution lies in conceptualizing Islamic ethical practice as a form of lived legal consciousness that operates alongside—and at times compensates for—the limitations of state law in transnational labor regimes. By foregrounding moral agency rather than victimhood, this study advances socio-legal debates on migrant precarity and offers a novel framework for understanding religion as an agentive resource within migration governance. Practically, it underscores the need for culturally and religiously responsive mechanisms in migrant protection policies beyond state-centric legal interventions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/16348</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31958/juris.v24i2.16348</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah); Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025); 369-380</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Juris; Vol 24 No 2 (2025); 369-380</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2763</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1412-6109</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.31958/juris.v24i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id/ojs/index.php/Juris/article/view/16348/5463</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Devika Rosa Guspita, Muflih  Ma’mun, Ahmad Hilmi, Mohamad Ghozali, Hastowohadi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>