Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati dalam RUU KUHP Perspektif Nilai-Nilai Pancasila

Riyadi, Sugeng; Prasetyo, Beny Timor

doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5329

Jurnal

Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati dalam RUU KUHP Perspektif Nilai-Nilai Pancasila

Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi · Vol. ksgeist (2021) · hlm. 249–263

DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5329
ISSN: 2615-5648, 2615-174X
Terbit: 2021-12-01
Penerbit: Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia
Bahasa: eng

Abstrak

Draft Law on the Criminal Code (RUU KUHP) still gives place to the death penalty as a type of crime. This policy is in the line of the establishment of the Constitutional Court which considers the death penalty to be constitutional. Even though there has been a decision on the constitutionality of the death penalty, the polemic about its existence still continues. So that we do not sway with various opinions, it is necessary that the death penalty policy is viewed from the perspective of Pancasila, because Pancasila is a legal ideal and at the same time as a Fundamental Norm of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to answer whether the death penalty moderation policy in the Criminal Code Bill is justified from the perspective of Pancasila or not. This research is a doctrinal legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a philosophical approach. The results showed that the death penalty policy in the Draft Criminal Code does not conflict with Pancasila.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

10 penulis · 15 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

Universitas Jambi
Afiliasi tidak diketahui

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Dewi Leisnoor S	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
M Fikri Amrullah	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Devia Arbarista Rismawati	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Yulia Cahyaningrum	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
M Jainuri	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Muhammad Fauzan	Universitas Jambi	1
Idamatussilmi Idamatussilmi	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Asep Budiman	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati dalam RUU KUHP Perspektif Nilai-Nilai Pancasila</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Riyadi, Sugeng</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Prasetyo, Beny Timor</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Draft criminal code; values of pancasila; death penalty.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Draft Law on the Criminal Code (RUU KUHP) still gives place to the death penalty as a type of crime. This policy is in the line of the establishment of the Constitutional Court which considers the death penalty to be constitutional. Even though there has been a decision on the constitutionality of the death penalty, the polemic about its existence still continues. So that we do not sway with various opinions, it is necessary that the death penalty policy is viewed from the perspective of Pancasila, because Pancasila is a legal ideal and at the same time as a Fundamental Norm of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to answer whether the death penalty moderation policy in the Criminal Code Bill is justified from the perspective of Pancasila or not. This research is a doctrinal legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a philosophical approach. The results showed that the death penalty policy in the Draft Criminal Code does not conflict with Pancasila.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-12-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/5329</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5329</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; Vol. 4 Issue 2 (2021) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; 249-263</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; Vol. 4 Issue 2 (2021) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; 249-263</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-5648</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-174X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/5329/2598</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Sugeng Riyadi, Beny Timor Prasetyo</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>