Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Concept as an Attempt for Protection of Human Rights in International Humanitarian Law Context

Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi · Vol. ksgeist (2023) · hlm. 103–118

DOI
10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7229
ISSN
2615-5648, 2615-174X
Terbit
2023-06-30
Penerbit
Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The 20th century was marked by mass murder and crime to humanity, such as genocide, war crime, and ethnic cleansing, resulting in tens of millions of deaths throughout the world. While the objective of establishing the United Nations in 1945 aimed at preventing such crimes, mass murders kept on occurring, as the cases in Bosnia and Rwanda in 1990s. The responsibility to protect (R2P) concept emerged as a response to these failures, by proposing that the sovereignty of a country should be based on the responsibility to protect its citizens, rather than the right to take actions without any intervention from the international world. This research aims at exploring the R2P concept as an attempt to protect human rights in the international humanitarian law context by analyzing the relevant literature and legal norms to discover how this concept can be the basis for protecting human rights under conflict situation and four mass violations of human rights. It used normative legal research method based on international law framework. Two approaches were used, namely conceptual and comparative ones. The research results indicated that R2P concept was the best alternative for humanitarian intervention to protect mankind from such crimes as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. In an intra-country conflict, the international community was responsible through preventive and military intervention attempts. The R2P concept was also relevant in international humanitarian law since it gave a clear framework in protecting human rights and preventing mass crimes, especially in relation to the use of military power.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

16 penulis · 31 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • University of Miskolc
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
  • UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Éva ErdősUniversity of Miskolc1
Miklós SzabóUniversity of Miskolc1
Auliya Ghazna NizamiUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
M. Kurnia Rahman AbadiaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Éva ErdősAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sanuri SanuriUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
Nafi’ MubarokUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
Yoga IramaUIN Syekh Wasil Kediri1
Masdar HilmyUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
Imroatul AzizahUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
Amiludin AmiludinUniversitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang1
Tiara PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Nurfauziah AhmadUniversitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Concept as an Attempt for Protection of Human Rights in International Humanitarian Law Context </dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mardiyanto, Ibnu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hidayatulloh, Hidayatulloh</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">MARDIYANTO, IBNU</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Responsibility to protect; International Humanitarian Law; Human rights.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The 20th century was marked by mass murder and crime to humanity, such as genocide, war crime, and ethnic cleansing, resulting in tens of millions of deaths throughout the world. While the objective of establishing the United Nations in 1945 aimed at preventing such crimes, mass murders kept on occurring, as the cases in Bosnia and Rwanda in 1990s. The responsibility to protect (R2P) concept emerged as a response to these failures, by proposing that the sovereignty of a country should be based on the responsibility to protect its citizens, rather than the right to take actions without any intervention from the international world. This research aims at exploring the R2P concept as an attempt to protect human rights in the international humanitarian law context by analyzing the relevant literature and legal norms to discover how this concept can be the basis for protecting human rights under conflict situation and four mass violations of human rights. It used normative legal research method based on international law framework. Two approaches were used, namely conceptual and comparative ones. The research results indicated that R2P concept was the best alternative for humanitarian intervention to protect mankind from such crimes as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. In an intra-country conflict, the international community was responsible through preventive and military intervention attempts. The R2P concept was also relevant in international humanitarian law since it gave a clear framework in protecting human rights and preventing mass crimes, especially in relation to the use of military power.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/7229</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7229</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; Vol. 6 Issue 1 (2023) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi; 103-118</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; Vol. 6 Issue 1 (2023) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi; 103-118</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-5648</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-174X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/7229/3326</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2023 Ibnu Mardiyanto, Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>