Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Digital Labour Platformer’s Legal Status and Decent Working Conditions: European Union and Indonesian Perspective

Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi · Vol. ksgeist (2024) · hlm. 157–175

DOI
10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10366
ISSN
2615-5648, 2615-174X
Terbit
2024-06-25
Penerbit
Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This article aims to provide the recent court decision on legal status and working conditions for the gig worker in European Union as well as a lesson for Indonesia through the EU’s notion on gig workers. The European Union (EU) Commission enacted in 2021 a draft Directive proposal to ensure Europe's gig (platform) workers enjoy the same labour rights as other traditional employees. This article employs doctrinal legal research with statutory and comparative approach, as well as court decision are considered as the main basis to protect gig workers. The result shows that the drafts Directive to ensure Europe’s gig workers is relied on Articles 16 and 153 (1)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), on data protection and working conditions, respectively. It has the advantage of giving certainty about the minimum requirements and procedural obligations that Member States must apply in platform work relations. Courts of several EU MSs, including Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the UK, already ruled in favour of platform workers not qualifying as self-employed, obliging platforms to reclassify them as employees. Meanwhile, Indonesia's perspective on gig workers remains vague, and the minimal standards for gig workers are unbalanced in comparison to the EU's perspective on gig workers. This article introduces the main notions and provisions of the proposed EU platform work Directive and analyses the current conditions and legal framework of Indonesia in handling the issue of gig workers.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

18 penulis · 34 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Szeged
  • University of Surabaya
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rofi Aulia RahmanUniversity of Surabaya1
Tanto LailamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iwan SatriawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farid Sufian ShuaibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Devi SeviyanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syamsir SyamsirHasanuddin University1
Eko NuriyatmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nova Bela DhytaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meline Gerarita SitompulAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyudi UmarUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kendari1
Andi Agus SalimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizki HabibulahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hesti ArmiwulanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Valentino Nathanael PrabowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
József HajdúAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Digital Labour Platformer’s Legal Status and Decent Working Conditions: European Union and Indonesian Perspective</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rahman, Rofi Aulia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hajdú, József</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nathanael, Valentino</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Algorithmic management; improving working condition; reclassification of platform work; self-employed.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article aims to provide the recent court decision on legal status and working conditions for the gig worker in European Union as well as a lesson for Indonesia through the EU’s notion on gig workers. The European Union (EU) Commission enacted in 2021 a draft Directive proposal to ensure Europe's gig (platform) workers enjoy the same labour rights as other traditional employees. This article employs doctrinal legal research with statutory and comparative approach, as well as court decision are considered as the main basis to protect gig workers. The result shows that the drafts Directive to ensure Europe’s gig workers is relied on Articles 16 and 153 (1)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), on data protection and working conditions, respectively. It has the advantage of giving certainty about the minimum requirements and procedural obligations that Member States must apply in platform work relations. Courts of several EU MSs, including Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the UK, already ruled in favour of platform workers not qualifying as self-employed, obliging platforms to reclassify them as employees. Meanwhile, Indonesia's perspective on gig workers remains vague, and the minimal standards for gig workers are unbalanced in comparison to the EU's perspective on gig workers. This article introduces the main notions and provisions of the proposed EU platform work Directive and analyses the current conditions and legal framework of Indonesia in handling the issue of gig workers.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/10366</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10366</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; Vol. 7 Issue 1 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi; 157-175</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi; Vol. 7 Issue 1 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi; 157-175</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-5648</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-174X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/volksgeist/article/view/10366/3810</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Rofi Aulia Rahman, József Hajdú, Valentino Nathanael</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>