Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

The meaning of “strength executive" in the Constitutional Court decision for the execution of fiduciary securities

Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum · Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 1–20

DOI
10.22219/ljih.v31i1.23244
ISSN
2549-4600, 0854-6509
Terbit
2023-03-19
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Judicial decisions must have legal implications for relevant parties. PMK No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 remains debatable between creditors and debtors because it seemingly weakens the protection of creditors' rights. Creditors cannot immediately carry out enforcement procedures that cut off the creditor's business flow because the position of the subject of fiduciary obligations is in the debtor's control, making it possible for disputes between debtors and creditors. This normative legal research was conducted using a philosophical, juridical approach covering statutory policies, conceptual and case approaches. PMK No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 does not regulate creditor legal provisions in enforcing fiduciary securities, making it difficult for creditors to execute them. The Constitutional Court should decide to guarantee justice for all parties and provide a decision with clear content and sentence structure, so multiple interpretations will not occur. The execution of fiduciary securities during the Covid-19 pandemic should not be immediately carried out because the creditor had to follow the predetermined procedures.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

30 penulis · 66 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 29 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus
  • Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Organisasi lain
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dina Imam SupaatUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia3
Khrisna HadiwinataPoliteknik Negeri Malang3
Moh. FadliUniversity of Brawijaya2
Dewi CahyandariUniversity of Brawijaya2
Iwan PermadiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Diah Pawestri MaharaniUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nur Auliya RahmatikaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Muchamad Ali Safa’atUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ratnawati RatnawatiHasanuddin University1
ABDUL RAHMANUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Widyarini Indriasti WardaniUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang1
Sigit IriantoUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang1
Markus Suryo UtomoUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang1
Airin LiemantoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Miftahus SholehudinUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Nandaru RamadhanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ramadhani SusiUniversity of Bengkulu1
Amancik AmancikUniversity of Bengkulu1
Sonia Ivana BarusUniversity of Bengkulu1
Putra Perdana Ahmad SaifullohUniversity of Bengkulu1
Liberthin PalullunganUniversitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus1
Lisma LumentutUniversitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus1
Hartati HartatiUniversitas Jambi1
Jamil JamilUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ngesti Dwi PrasetyoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Dhiana PuspitawatiUniversity of Brawijaya1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The meaning of “strength executive" in the Constitutional Court decision for the execution of fiduciary securities</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Muslim, Shohib</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hadiyantina, Shinta</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mundzir, Hudriyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ayub, Zainal Amin</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Meaning</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Decision</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Fiduciary</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Execution</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Judicial decisions must have legal implications for relevant parties. PMK No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 remains debatable between creditors and debtors because it seemingly weakens the protection of creditors' rights. Creditors cannot immediately carry out enforcement procedures that cut off the creditor's business flow because the position of the subject of fiduciary obligations is in the debtor's control, making it possible for disputes between debtors and creditors. This normative legal research was conducted using a philosophical, juridical approach covering statutory policies, conceptual and case approaches. PMK No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 does not regulate creditor legal provisions in enforcing fiduciary securities, making it difficult for creditors to execute them. The Constitutional Court should decide to guarantee justice for all parties and provide a decision with clear content and sentence structure, so multiple interpretations will not occur. The execution of fiduciary securities during the Covid-19 pandemic should not be immediately carried out because the creditor had to follow the predetermined procedures.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-03-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/23244</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22219/ljih.v31i1.23244</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023): March; 1-20</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4600</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0854-6509</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/23244/12110</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 1970 Shohib Muslim, Shinta Hadiyantina, Hudriyah Mundzir, Zainal Amin Ayub</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>