Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Islamic nomocracy: from the perspectives of Indonesia, Spain and Russia

Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum · Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 91–111

DOI
10.22219/ljih.v31i1.25358
ISSN
2549-4600, 0854-6509
Terbit
2023-04-15
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The Indonesian Islamic nomocracy paradigm has a long history and a cultural relationship with the national struggle that coincides with political and religious orientations. The Islamic nomocracy is inseparable from the relationship between Islam and the state rather than being linked to Islamic doctrine and power. This research employed the normative sociological method. It used a philosophical approach from Barbour’s paradigm of the relationship between religion and science and Habermas’ thought on religion in public spaces. This research strives to analyze the Islamic nomocratic paradigm pattern prior to Indonesian independence as a crucial stage that influences the following eras, namely the post-independence era, the Old Order Era, the New Order Era, and the Post-Reformation era up to now. This research aims to find the basics and the development of the Islamic nomocracy in the Indonesian legal system. The roots of the Islamic nomocracy legal thought in Indonesia can be traced to the pre-independence era. In the development of Islamic kingdoms, there was a dialog and integration process between the Islamic nomocracy and the kingdom government. After the War of Java, the conflict and independence pattern was formed. Before Indonesian independence, the Islamic nomocracy thought developed into Pan Islamism which tended to be conical to legal formalization through the caliphate system. After Indonesia’s independence, some of the Islamic nomocracy legal thought recognized the state as one of the legal systems in Indonesia besides customary law and positive law. Then, Indonesia became a partly-Islamic Legal State with a constant up-and-down relationship with the state. The authors also completed this paper with perspectives of Spain and Russia as both have been ruled under Muslim governance.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 123 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 73 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
  • Tashkent State University of Law
  • University of Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
  • St Petersburg University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Kudus
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Wardah YuspinMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta6
Said Saidakhrarovich GulyamovTashkent State University of Law5
Achmadi AchmadiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya4
Syaifuddin ZuhdiMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta3
Trias HernandaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kudus3
Mohammad Indra BangsawanMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta3
Rizka RizkaMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta3
Faisal FaisalMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta2
Reema BhattacharyaJagannath University2
Rahma ShofiaMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta2
Abdul HakimAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ayesha Hendriana NgestiningrumKementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia2
Elya Kusuma DewiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon2
Nunik NurhayatiMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta2
Rina Arum PrastyantiUniversitas Duta Bangsa2
Alisa IbrahimUniversity of Kuala Lumpur2
Agustinus AstonoPanca Bhakti University2
Nozimbek DilboboevTashkent State University of Law2
Syifa Rana TsaryMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta2
Aidul Fitriciada AzhariMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta2
Angkasa AngkasaJenderal Soedirman University1
Ahmad Shamsul Abd AzizUniversiti Utara Malaysia1
Ulfah Dwi RahmawatiMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta1
Fahmi FairuzzamanMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta1
Muhammad JunaidiState University of Semarang1
Rozanah Ab RahmanUniversiti Putra Malaysia1
Endah PujiastutiUniversitas Semarang1
Valisher SapayevMamun University1
Mutimatun Ni'amiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Baskoro Tri PamungkasMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta1
Bambang SetiajiMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta1
Nurjannah SeptyanunUniversity of Muhammadiyah Mataram1
Hilman Syahrial HaqUniversity of Muhammadiyah Mataram1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Islamic nomocracy:  from the perspectives of Indonesia, Spain and Russia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Wibowo, Sugeng</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dimyati, Khudzaifah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Absori, Absori</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wardiono, Kelik</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ramon, Tomás Mateo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Budiono, Arief</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Lyandova, Vanka</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Islamic nomocracy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Science</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Religion</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Public spaces</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The Indonesian Islamic nomocracy paradigm has a long history and a cultural relationship with the national struggle that coincides with political and religious orientations. The Islamic nomocracy is inseparable from the relationship between Islam and the state rather than being linked to Islamic doctrine and power. This research employed the normative sociological method. It used a philosophical approach from Barbour’s paradigm of the relationship between religion and science and Habermas’ thought on religion in public spaces. This research strives to analyze the Islamic nomocratic paradigm pattern prior to Indonesian independence as a crucial stage that influences the following eras, namely the post-independence era, the Old Order Era, the New Order Era, and the Post-Reformation era up to now. This research aims to find the basics and the development of the Islamic nomocracy in the Indonesian legal system. The roots of the Islamic nomocracy legal thought in Indonesia can be traced to the pre-independence era. In the development of Islamic kingdoms, there was a dialog and integration process between the Islamic nomocracy and the kingdom government. After the War of Java, the conflict and independence pattern was formed. Before Indonesian independence, the Islamic nomocracy thought developed into Pan Islamism which tended to be conical to legal formalization through the caliphate system. After Indonesia’s independence, some of the Islamic nomocracy legal thought recognized the state as one of the legal systems in Indonesia besides customary law and positive law. Then, Indonesia became a partly-Islamic Legal State with a constant up-and-down relationship with the state. The authors also completed this paper with perspectives of Spain and Russia as both have been ruled under Muslim governance.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-04-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/25358</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22219/ljih.v31i1.25358</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023): March; 91-111</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4600</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0854-6509</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/25358/12259</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Sugeng Wibowo, Khudzaifah Dimyati, Absori Absori, Kelik Wardiono, Tomás Mateo Ramon, Arief Budiono, Vanka Lyandova</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>