Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

In Search of Forfeited Fiduciary Assurance: A Justice Approach

Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum · Vol. 33 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 585–608

DOI
10.22219/ljih.v33i2.42371
ISSN
2549-4600, 0854-6509
Terbit
2025-10-21
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study examines the legal consequences and proposes a fair model of confiscation that balances the interests of creditors, debtors, and the state. The research employs a normative legal approach, integrating John Rawls’ theory of justice and progressive legal theory, and applies descriptive methods and deductive syllogistic analysis to examine relevant doctrines, legal principles, and judicial practices. The findings reveal significant gaps in current fiduciary regulations, particularly the absence of mechanisms to address the consequences of state confiscation, to provide compensation to affected parties, and to protect receivables rights in cases of loss or damage. In response, the study proposes a reconstructed legal framework that introduces a sanctioning scheme coupled with proportional compensation, explicitly incorporated into court judgments. This model upholds procedural justice and equality among parties, aligning with Rawls’ difference principle. The study concludes that revising fiduciary regulations to include explicit provisions for state confiscation and associated compensation mechanisms should enhance legal certainty, ensure proportional protection of all parties, and promote a fair and effective enforcement system.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 96 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Universitas Islam Makassar
  • Universitas Pertamina
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Hari PurwadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rehnalemken GintingAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rian SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tiara TiolinceAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yapiter MarpiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad RustamajiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Supanto SupantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SUPRIYANTO SUPRIYANTOAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Itok Dwi KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Soehartono SoehartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Acacio FernadesAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Diana LukitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Subekti SubektiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Esti PratiwiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jaco BarkhuizenAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M ZaidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad SyaifulUniversitas Islam Makassar1
Triyono Adi SaputroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Emmy LatifahSebelas Maret University1
Ismail RumadanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hazeem Moutawally ElsyafeiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lego KarjokoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aji RahmadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Willy Naresta HanumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Giovan Bintang Graha PratamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mufidah MufidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Isharyanto IsharyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Musa WardiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad AbdillahUniversitas Pertamina1
Sulistiyanta SulistiyantaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahmawati RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Deshinta Arrova DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismunarno IsmunarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri Budi RahajoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Hidayah FebriyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Teguh HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/oai, pertama di-harvest 7 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">In Search of Forfeited Fiduciary Assurance: A Justice Approach</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Permatasari, Novi Rizka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suwadi, Pujiyono</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Assurance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Fiduciary</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Forfeited</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study examines the legal consequences and proposes a fair model of confiscation that balances the interests of creditors, debtors, and the state. The research employs a normative legal approach, integrating John Rawls’ theory of justice and progressive legal theory, and applies descriptive methods and deductive syllogistic analysis to examine relevant doctrines, legal principles, and judicial practices. The findings reveal significant gaps in current fiduciary regulations, particularly the absence of mechanisms to address the consequences of state confiscation, to provide compensation to affected parties, and to protect receivables rights in cases of loss or damage. In response, the study proposes a reconstructed legal framework that introduces a sanctioning scheme coupled with proportional compensation, explicitly incorporated into court judgments. This model upholds procedural justice and equality among parties, aligning with Rawls’ difference principle. The study concludes that revising fiduciary regulations to include explicit provisions for state confiscation and associated compensation mechanisms should enhance legal certainty, ensure proportional protection of all parties, and promote a fair and effective enforcement system.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-10-21</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/42371</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22219/ljih.v33i2.42371</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2025): September; 585-608</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-4600</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0854-6509</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/42371/17396</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Novi Rizka Permatasari, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih, Pujiyono Suwadi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>