Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Detecting the Helicobacter pylori 16S rRNA Gene in Dyspepsia Patients Using Real-Time PCR

ACTA MEDICA INDONESIANA · Vol. 51 No. 1 (2019)

ISSN
2338-2732, 0125-9326
Terbit
2019-05-10
Penerbit
The Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Background: early detection of H. pylori is essential to prevent the development of infections into gastric malignancies. The coccoid form of H. pylori is difficult to detect either by culture or histopathology; however, it can be detected using molecular methods, such as real-time PCR. The study was expected to provide new information on the development of H. pylori detection. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between October 2016 and August 2017. The sampling method used was consecutive sampling. Biopsy from gastric antrum and corpus were performed in 64 patients. We collected 2 specimens from each site to be examined using real-time PCR and histopathology. Initially, we conducted real-time PCR optimization followed by application of clinical samples from gastric biopsy. Data analysis using McNemar’s χ2 and Kappa tests. Results: the real-time PCR showed 25% positivity, while the positive proportion of histopathological examination was 14%. Real-time PCR has a sensitivity and specificity 88.9% dan 85.5%, respectively. The McNemar’s χ2 test showed that there is significantly different (p=0.039) between the two tests; kappa value (p=0.561). Conclusion: the real-time PCR examination is more sensitive than histopathology. This technique can improve diagnosis by 11% compared to histopathological examination.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 139 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dadang MakmunAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Murdani AbdullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Siti SetiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Fera IbrahimAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Yulia Rosa SaharmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Adityo SusiloAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Cleopas Martin RumendeAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hamzah ShatriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Saskia Aziza NursyirwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Amanda Pitarini UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rudy HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nury NusdwinuringtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aria KekalihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agus Dwi SusantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Siti Chandra WidjanantieAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Maria Regina RachmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Won Ah ChoiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Seong Woong KangAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Achmad FauziAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dita AditianingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ikhwan RinaldiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursinah MursinahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Radhiyatam MardhiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Raksheeth AgarwalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Oliver E YausepAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sharon Hanmy AngelAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Angga W LokeswaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ening KrisnuhoniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rabbinu Rangga PribadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ibnu Fajariyadi HantoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Luki KusumaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizani Putri ImanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tiroy JunitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rinaldo Indra RachmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus SjahrurachmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ardath H SitorusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://www.actamedindones.org/index.php/ijim/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Detecting the Helicobacter pylori 16S rRNA Gene  in Dyspepsia Patients Using Real-Time PCR</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Syahniar, Rike</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wahid, Mardiastuti H</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Syam, Ari Fahrial</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yasmon, Andi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">H. pylori</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">histopathology</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">real-time PCR</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">gastroenterology</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: early detection of H. pylori is essential to prevent the development of infections into gastric malignancies. The coccoid form of H. pylori is difficult to detect either by culture or histopathology; however, it can be detected using molecular methods, such as real-time PCR. The study was expected to provide new information on the development of H. pylori detection. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between October 2016 and August 2017. The sampling method used was consecutive sampling. Biopsy from gastric antrum and corpus were performed in 64 patients. We collected 2 specimens from each site to be examined using real-time PCR and histopathology. Initially, we conducted real-time PCR optimization followed by application of clinical samples from gastric biopsy. Data analysis using McNemar’s χ2 and Kappa tests. Results: the real-time PCR showed 25% positivity, while the positive proportion of histopathological examination was 14%. Real-time PCR has a sensitivity and specificity 88.9% dan 85.5%, respectively. The McNemar’s χ2 test showed that there is significantly different (p=0.039) between the two tests; kappa value (p=0.561).  Conclusion: the real-time PCR examination is more sensitive than histopathology. This technique can improve diagnosis by 11% compared to histopathological examination.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">The Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-05-10</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>http://www.actamedindones.org/index.php/ijim/article/view/517</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Acta Medica Indonesiana; Vol. 51 No. 1 (2019): Acta Medica Indonesiana; 34</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2338-2732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0125-9326</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>http://www.actamedindones.org/index.php/ijim/article/view/517/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Medica Indonesiana</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>