Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges' Views

Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 37–52

DOI
10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464
ISSN
2548-3382, 2548-3374
Terbit
2023-05-16
Penerbit
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to assess how judges make decisions regarding disputes over grants on marital property from the perspectives of two legal systems, KHI and KHES. Specifically, the study examines a case (numbered 145/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slk) that was heard at the Solok City, West Sumatera Religious Court and involved a communal property grant dispute. The research methodology used was normative juridical, a quantitative approach that uses secondary legal principles, and a qualitative system that relies on library research data. The study's findings indicate that comparing grant arrangements by Compilation of Islamic Law and Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, specifically in terms of the pillars mentioned in KHI and KHES, is closer to the consensus of scholars but not identical because KHI has additional witnesses and KHES has qabd.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

10 penulis · 19 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
  • Qassim University
  • Universitas Islam Darussalam
  • Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
  • King Faisal University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rashifahunnisa’ MelliniaMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta1
Rozi Irfan RosyadhiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad ZakiyMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Fahmi Ali HudaefiUniversitas Islam Darussalam1
Abdelkader LaallamKing Faisal University1
Fauzul Hanif Noor AthiefMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges' Views</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Apriantoro, Muhamad Subhi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Alis, M. Naufal Ibnu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Septianozakia, Sendy</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Setiana, Dadang</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Dispute Resolution</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Joint Property Grant</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Arbitration</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Litigation</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to assess how judges make decisions regarding disputes over grants on marital property from the perspectives of two legal systems, KHI and KHES. Specifically, the study examines a case (numbered 145/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Slk) that was heard at the Solok City, West Sumatera Religious Court and involved a communal property grant dispute. The research methodology used was normative juridical, a quantitative approach that uses secondary legal principles, and a qualitative system that relies on library research data. The study's findings indicate that comparing grant arrangements by Compilation of Islamic Law and Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, specifically in terms of the pillars mentioned in KHI and KHES, is closer to the consensus of scholars but not identical because KHI has additional witnesses and KHES has qabd.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-05-16</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/article/view/6464</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam; Vol. 8 No. 1 May (2023); 37-52</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id-ID">AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam; Vol 8 No 1 May (2023); 37-52</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-3382</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-3374</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.29240/jhi.v8i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/article/view/6464/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Muhamad Subhi Apriantoro, M. Naufal Ibnu Alis, Sendy Septianozakia, Dadang Setiana</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>