Akses terbuka
Jurnal
SINTA 1
Between Flogging and Imprisonment: The Disparity Effect of the Sharia Court's Decision on the Supremacy of the Qanun Jinayat of Aceh
Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam
ISSN 2548-3382, 2548-3374
Terbit 2024-10-19
Penerbit Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup
Bahasa eng
Abstrak
This research aims to map the same cases with different sentencing decisions, determine the causes for the disparities in penalties in those decisions, and elaborate on the reasons for judges in making decisions. Qanun Jinayat of Aceh has designated flogging as the primary punishment for qanun violators. Nonetheless, many Sharia Court judges sentence offenders of sexual crimes to prison. This is empirical legal research with a normative juridical approach and a Sharia approach. Data were collected through interviews and the examination of decision documents. Those data were analyzed using data reduction, data display, and data verification. This research found that the same cases with different decisions include cases of rape, sexual harassment, and accusations of adultery. More prison sentences are imposed by Sharia Court judges in these cases than flogging and fines. The fundamental reason for these differences in decisions is due to the qanun's punishment choices, which are tinted by judges' perspectives in assessing Sharia-based qanun rules. Another factor for this disparity is the community's insistence that cases of rape and sexual harassment be punished by imprisonment or the authority to be remanded to the District Court. Some people argue that flogging has not deterred the perpetrators because, if the judge decides on this sentence, it may be carried out in a short time. Then, the perpetrator immediately returns to society and has an opportunity to repeat his crimes, while the victim is still in a traumatized state.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
19 penulis ·
41 tautan kepenulisan bersama
· 23 lintas organisasi
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.
Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Between Flogging and Imprisonment: The Disparity Effect of the Sharia Court's Decision on the Supremacy of the Qanun Jinayat of Aceh</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Salma, Salma</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rama, Alfi Syukri</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jarudin, Jarudin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Samsudin, Muhammad Adib bin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fadhilah, Defi Rahmi</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Disparity</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">flogging</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">hudud</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">imprisonment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">jinayat</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research aims to map the same cases with different sentencing decisions, determine the causes for the disparities in penalties in those decisions, and elaborate on the reasons for judges in making decisions. Qanun Jinayat of Aceh has designated flogging as the primary punishment for qanun violators. Nonetheless, many Sharia Court judges sentence offenders of sexual crimes to prison. This is empirical legal research with a normative juridical approach and a Sharia approach. Data were collected through interviews and the examination of decision documents. Those data were analyzed using data reduction, data display, and data verification. This research found that the same cases with different decisions include cases of rape, sexual harassment, and accusations of adultery. More prison sentences are imposed by Sharia Court judges in these cases than flogging and fines. The fundamental reason for these differences in decisions is due to the qanun's punishment choices, which are tinted by judges' perspectives in assessing Sharia-based qanun rules. Another factor for this disparity is the community's insistence that cases of rape and sexual harassment be punished by imprisonment or the authority to be remanded to the District Court. Some people argue that flogging has not deterred the perpetrators because, if the judge decides on this sentence, it may be carried out in a short time. Then, the perpetrator immediately returns to society and has an opportunity to repeat his crimes, while the victim is still in a traumatized state.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2024-10-19</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/article/view/8397</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.29240/jhi.v9i2.8397</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024); 573-596</dc:source>
<dc:source xml:lang="id-ID">AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam; Vol 9 No 2 (2024); 573-596</dc:source>
<dc:source>2548-3382</dc:source>
<dc:source>2548-3374</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.29240/jhi.v9i2</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/article/view/8397/3148</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Salma Salma, Alfi Syukri Rama, Jarudin Jarudin, Muhammad Adib bin Samsudin, Defi Rahmi Fadhilah</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Sitasi dan pengindeksan
Jumlah menurut tiap indeks pada 13 Nov 2026; setiap indeks menghitung sitasi dengan cara berbeda.
OpenAlex juga mencatat karya ini di: crossref, doaj.
Sitasi artikel ini
APA 7
Salma, S., Rama, A. S., Jarudin, J., Samsudin, M. A. b., & Fadhilah, D. R. (2024). Between Flogging and Imprisonment: The Disparity Effect of the Sharia Court's Decision on the Supremacy of the Qanun Jinayat of Aceh. Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.8397
Salin
IEEE
S. Salma, A. S. Rama, J. Jarudin, M. A. b. Samsudin, and D. R. Fadhilah, “Between Flogging and Imprisonment: The Disparity Effect of the Sharia Court's Decision on the Supremacy of the Qanun Jinayat of Aceh,” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 573–596, 2024, doi: 10.29240/jhi.v9i2.8397.
Salin
Dibuat dari metadata jurnal; periksa nama penulis sebelum dipakai.