Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

The Contestation of Legal Foundations in the Resolution of Islamic Economic Disputes in Religious Courts

Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam · Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 271–288

DOI
10.24090/mnh.v18i2.11934
ISSN
2579-4167, 1978-6670
Terbit
2024-09-19
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Prior to the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2008, judges in Sharia economic dispute cases primarily relied on legal sources from kutub al-turāṡ (classical fiqh texts), including those pertaining to fiqh al-qadā’ (jurisprudence on adjudication). However, following the implementation of this regulation, some judges have continued to incorporate the Civil Code in their legal reasoning. This article seeks to examine the legal framework for resolving Sharia economic disputes in Indonesia. The theoretical foundation applied by the author is Lawrence Meir Friedman’s legal system theory. This study employs a normative legal approach to explore the legal system governing Sharia economic justice in Indonesia’s Religious Courts. It examines decisions from the Religious Courts in Purbalingga, Banyumas, and Purwokerto, focusing on rulings made both before and after the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation on the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES), as well as five decisions from 2018-2019. The study’s findings reveal that the legal framework for Sharia economic dispute resolution in Indonesia has adequately addressed community needs, with the Religious Courts holding exclusive jurisdiction over these matters. However, there is an ongoing contestation between Islamic legal sources and civil law, which is rooted in Dutch law, in the decisions analyzed. Moreover, the absence of a Compilation of Islamic Economic Procedure Law based on Islamic Law has contributed to the suboptimal implementation of legal substance and culture. As a result, according to Friedman’s legal system theory, the legal framework for resolving Islamic economic disputes has not yet functioned effectively from the perspective of Islamic law.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

17 penulis · 32 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung
  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
  • Al-Azhar University
  • Universitas KH. Mukhtar Syafaat
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Madura
  • Selangor Islamic University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Landy Trisna AbdurrahmanSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta3
Jaih MubarokSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Muhammad Al-Fayyadh MaulanaAl-Azhar University1
Amanda Putri ShalimarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhamad NasrudinUniversitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung1
Zainul Mun’imUniversitas KH. Mukhtar Syafaat1
Suaidi SuaidiUniversitas Islam Negeri Madura1
Moh TamtowiSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Muhamad Ulul Albab MusaffaSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Dedah JubaedahSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Ending SolehudinSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Oyo Sunaryo MukhlasSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Muhammad Farhan bin Mat NoradinSelangor Islamic University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Contestation of Legal Foundations in the Resolution of Islamic Economic Disputes in Religious Courts</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hasanudin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kamsi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anshori, Ahmad Yani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Hasanudin, Hasanudin</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Contestation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal system</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sharia economic disputes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Religious Courts</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Prior to the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2008, judges in Sharia economic dispute cases primarily relied on legal sources from kutub al-turāṡ (classical fiqh texts), including those pertaining to fiqh al-qadā’ (jurisprudence on adjudication). However, following the implementation of this regulation, some judges have continued to incorporate the Civil Code in their legal reasoning. This article seeks to examine the legal framework for resolving Sharia economic disputes in Indonesia. The theoretical foundation applied by the author is Lawrence Meir Friedman’s legal system theory. This study employs a normative legal approach to explore the legal system governing Sharia economic justice in Indonesia’s Religious Courts. It examines decisions from the Religious Courts in Purbalingga, Banyumas, and Purwokerto, focusing on rulings made both before and after the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation on the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES), as well as five decisions from 2018-2019. The study’s findings reveal that the legal framework for Sharia economic dispute resolution in Indonesia has adequately addressed community needs, with the Religious Courts holding exclusive jurisdiction over these matters. However, there is an ongoing contestation between Islamic legal sources and civil law, which is rooted in Dutch law, in the decisions analyzed. Moreover, the absence of a Compilation of Islamic Economic Procedure Law based on Islamic Law has contributed to the suboptimal implementation of legal substance and culture. As a result, according to Friedman’s legal system theory, the legal framework for resolving Islamic economic disputes has not yet functioned effectively from the perspective of Islamic law.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-09-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/11934</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24090/mnh.v18i2.11934</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024); 271-288</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2579-4167</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-6670</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24090/mnh.v18i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/11934/3941</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Hasanudin, Kamsi, Ahmad Yani Anshori</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>