Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework

Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam · Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 247–270

DOI
10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736
ISSN
2579-4167, 1978-6670
Terbit
2025-10-24
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study presents a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia’s legal frameworks for protecting victims of domestic violence through the lens of Islamic legal principles. It examines both substantive and procedural dimensions in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘ird), and family integrity (ḥifẓ al-nasl). Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2004 provides broad substantive protection by recognizing various forms of violence physical, psychological, sexual, and economic and extending safeguards to domestic workers. This inclusivity aligns with the Islamic principle of ‘adl (justice) and the duty to uphold human dignity, though weak coordination and limited law enforcement training hinder procedural implementation. In contrast, Malaysia’s Domestic Violence Act 1994 demonstrates stronger procedural responsiveness, particularly in issuing protection orders and promoting inter-agency cooperation. While its narrower scope excludes domestic workers, it reflects dar’ al-mafāsid (prevention of harm) through timely intervention. Malaysia’s dual legal system also integrates Islamic values into judicial practice. The study concludes that Indonesia excels in substantive inclusivity, while Malaysia demonstrates procedural strength. A hybrid model combining Indonesia’s normative scope with Malaysia’s procedural efficiency would better fulfill the Shariah’s holistic objectives of justice and protection.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

16 penulis · 31 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 20 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
  • International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga
  • Organisasi lain
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ilyya MuhsinUniversitas Islam Negeri Salatiga2
Indrya SariHasanuddin University1
Andi Adri AriefHasanuddin University1
Mardiana Ethrawaty FachryHasanuddin University1
Andi AmriHasanuddin University1
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University1
Lego KarjokoSebelas Maret University1
Sukron Ma’munWestern Sydney University1
Vivi AriyantiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Adnan AdnanSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Najhan Parluhutan HarahapMutah University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Assessing Indonesia and Malaysia’s Legal Responsiveness to Domestic Violence Victims within Islamic Law Framework</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nuroniyah, Wardah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Al Azkiya, Mohammad Azka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wahid, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en"> Labib Shodiq, Fatimah Lubabiyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Maula, Bani Syarif</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Domestic Violence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Islamic Family Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Victim Protection</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Malaysia</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study presents a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Malaysia’s legal frameworks for protecting victims of domestic violence through the lens of Islamic legal principles. It examines both substantive and procedural dimensions in light of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which emphasize the preservation of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), dignity (ḥifẓ al-‘ird), and family integrity (ḥifẓ al-nasl). Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2004 provides broad substantive protection by recognizing various forms of violence physical, psychological, sexual, and economic and extending safeguards to domestic workers. This inclusivity aligns with the Islamic principle of ‘adl (justice) and the duty to uphold human dignity, though weak coordination and limited law enforcement training hinder procedural implementation. In contrast, Malaysia’s Domestic Violence Act 1994 demonstrates stronger procedural responsiveness, particularly in issuing protection orders and promoting inter-agency cooperation. While its narrower scope excludes domestic workers, it reflects dar’ al-mafāsid (prevention of harm) through timely intervention. Malaysia’s dual legal system also integrates Islamic values into judicial practice. The study concludes that Indonesia excels in substantive inclusivity, while Malaysia demonstrates procedural strength. A hybrid model combining Indonesia’s normative scope with Malaysia’s procedural efficiency would better fulfill the Shariah’s holistic objectives of justice and protection.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-10-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/13736</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24090/mnh.v19i2.13736</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025); 247-270</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2579-4167</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-6670</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24090/mnh.v19i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/almanahij/article/view/13736/4502</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Wardah Nuroniyah, Mohammad Azka Al Azkiya, Abdul Wahid, Fatimah Lubabiyah  Labib Shodiq, Bani Syarif Maula</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>