Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Classification Of Maternal Health Risk Using Three Models Naive Bayes Method

IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems) · Vol. 17 No. 4 (2023) · pp. 395–404

DOI
10.22146/ijccs.84242
ISSN
2460-7258, 1978-1520
Published
2023-10-31
Publisher
IndoCEISS in colaboration with Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Lack of information related to maternal health care during pregnancy and post-pregnancy, especially in rural areas, results in many cases of pregnancy complications. Risk analysis for pregnant women is really needed as a reference in handling pregnant women so that the risk to pregnant women can be minimized. To analyze the risk of pregnant women can use data mining techniques by classifying the risk of pregnant women. This study proposes to classify Maternal Health Risk using the Naive Bayes method with three models, namely Gaussian, Multinomial, and Bournolli. The data used is the health data of pregnant women based on risk intensity which is grouped into three classes, namely low, mid and high risk. while the attributes are Age, Systolic Blood Pressure as SystolicBP, Diastolic BP as DiastolicBP, Blood Sugar as BS, Body Temperature as BodyTemp, and HeartRate. The results show that among the three Naïve Bayes models that have the best performance are the Multinomial and Bournolli with an accuracy of 84.8% while the Gaussian produces an accuracy of 82.6%.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

5 authors · 7 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Pancasakti Makassar
  • Lambung Mangkurat University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Supriyadi La WungoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Classification Of Maternal Health Risk Using Three Models Naive Bayes Method</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mustamin, Nurul Fathanah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Aziz, Firman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Firmansyah, Firmansyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ishak, Pertiwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">machine learning; data mining; data analytic</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Classification; Maternal Health Risk; Gaussian Naïve Bayes; Multinomial Naïve Bayes; Bournolli Naïve Bayes</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Lack of information related to maternal health care during pregnancy and post-pregnancy, especially in rural areas, results in many cases of pregnancy complications. Risk analysis for pregnant women is really needed as a reference in handling pregnant women so that the risk to pregnant women can be minimized. To analyze the risk of pregnant women can use data mining techniques by classifying the risk of pregnant women. This study proposes to classify Maternal Health Risk using the Naive Bayes method with three models, namely Gaussian, Multinomial, and Bournolli. The data used is the health data of pregnant women based on risk intensity which is grouped into three classes, namely low, mid and high risk. while the attributes are Age, Systolic Blood Pressure as SystolicBP, Diastolic BP as DiastolicBP, Blood Sugar as BS, Body Temperature as BodyTemp, and HeartRate. The results show that among the three Naïve Bayes models that have the best performance are the Multinomial and Bournolli with an accuracy of 84.8% while the Gaussian produces an accuracy of 82.6%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">IndoCEISS in colaboration with Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2023-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/84242</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22146/ijccs.84242</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems); Vol 17, No 4 (2023): October; 395-404</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-7258</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-1520</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/84242/37711</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>