Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

COMMUNITY BELIEFS ON ANIMAL SIGNALLING: EVIDENCE FROM WEST PAPUAN TRIBAL GROUPS

BIOTROPIA · Vol. 33 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 60–76

DOI
10.11598/btb.2026.33.1.2405
ISSN
1907-770X, 0215-6334
Terbit
2026-01-19
Penerbit
SEAMEO BIOTROP
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Abstrak

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS Indigenous communities read animal signs as early warnings for nature events Shared experiences shape how different animal behaviours gain meaning Local wisdom shows animals as sensitive partners in human survival ABSTRACTObserving animal behavior and daily activities can help humans gain knowledge and derive practical benefits. A mixed-method approach, combining desk-based study and telephone interviews, was employed to collect data from seven major Papuan tribal groups. The desk study involved the collection of approximately 2,000 references published between 1980 and 2020 using keyword-based searches conducted with specialized software. Data were also provided by leaders from the seven major communities. The collected data were analyzed using Rayyan, VoS Viewer, Crammer’s Phi, and Microsoft Excel. The principal findings indicate that 14 publications addressed topics related to animal signaling and community beliefs. The animals recognized by the seven major tribal group as exhibiting signals included mammals (52%), fish (8%), reptiles (12%), amphibians (8%), birds (4%), and insects (16%). Animals were reported to convey signals through vocalizations (sounds), appearance, body parts, wastes, tracks, constructed objects, and odors. The result of Crammer’s Phi analysis showed (168) = 219.48, P = 0.0046, df = 168, = 0.05 and 0.01, and φc = 0.0105 (1%). This results indicate a significant association between perceived values in interpreting animal signals and tribal community groups in West Papua. A Cartesian graph demonstrated low-to-high levels of both animal signaling and beliefs. Beliefs and practices related to animal sensitivity and communication vary across cultures and communities worldwide. Many indigenous communities maintain a deep spiritual connection with nature and animals, viewing them as sentient beings with their own forms of communication and sensitivity.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 178 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 44 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Papua
  • Hasanuddin University
  • IPB University
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • East–West Center
  • Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sepus M. FatemUniversitas Papua4
Jonni MarwaUniversitas Papua3
Ahmad MaryudiUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Yaved SyufUniversitas Papua2
Josepina BaruUniversitas Papua2
Viktor TawerAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Saur SitumorangAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Agus Irianto SumuleUniversitas Papua2
Michael A. BaransanoIPB University2
Hikmah HikmahHasanuddin University1
Muhammad Irfan SaidHasanuddin University1
Nahariah NahariahHasanuddin University1
Muhammad Alif K. SahideHasanuddin University1
Dwiko Budi PermadiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Mariana Y. PedayAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bustar MaitarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
San Afri AwangUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Antoni UngirwaluUniversitas Papua1
Agustinus MurdjokoUniversitas Papua1
Micah R. FisherEast–West Center1
Nurhady SirimorokHasanuddin University1
Yafed SufiUniversitas Papua1
Andi ZulfikarUniversitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji1
Dietriech Geoffrey BengenIPB University1
I Wayan NurjayaIPB University1
Nyoman Metta N. NatihIPB University1
Calvin S. BealeAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">COMMUNITY BELIEFS ON ANIMAL SIGNALLING: EVIDENCE FROM WEST PAPUAN TRIBAL GROUPS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anjelus Iyai, Deny</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yustenci Runtuboi, Yubelince</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">A. Pattikawa, Vapriel</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">F. Haryati, Stepani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Prianka P., Azchar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Prasetya, Rizki</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sagrim, Meky</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">A. Arief, Fitri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">R. Runtuboi, Ferawati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Riskayanti, Riskayanti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amalia, Ditasari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">C. Dami, Juni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pakage, Stepanus</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">signalizing animals</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">community belief</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">earlier warning systems</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">sensitivity animals</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">community Papuan tribal</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Multifunction Animals</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Human-Animal Interaction</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Indigenous communities read animal signs as early warnings for nature events
Shared experiences shape how different animal behaviours gain meaning
Local wisdom shows animals as sensitive partners in human survival

 
ABSTRACTObserving animal behavior and daily activities can help humans gain knowledge and derive practical benefits. A mixed-method approach, combining desk-based study and telephone interviews, was employed to collect data from seven major Papuan tribal groups. The desk study involved the collection of approximately 2,000 references published between 1980 and 2020 using keyword-based searches conducted with specialized software. Data were also provided by leaders from the seven major communities. The collected data were analyzed using Rayyan, VoS Viewer, Crammer’s Phi, and Microsoft Excel. The principal findings indicate that 14 publications addressed topics related to animal signaling and community beliefs. The animals recognized by the seven major tribal group as exhibiting signals included mammals (52%), fish (8%), reptiles (12%), amphibians (8%), birds (4%), and insects (16%). Animals were reported to convey signals through vocalizations (sounds), appearance, body parts, wastes, tracks, constructed objects, and odors. The result of Crammer’s Phi analysis showed (168) = 219.48, P = 0.0046, df = 168,  = 0.05 and 0.01, and φc = 0.0105 (1%). This results indicate a significant association between perceived values in interpreting animal signals and tribal community groups in West Papua. A Cartesian graph demonstrated low-to-high levels of both animal signaling and beliefs. Beliefs and practices related to animal sensitivity and communication vary across cultures and communities worldwide. Many indigenous communities maintain a deep spiritual connection with nature and animals, viewing them as sentient beings with their own forms of communication and sensitivity.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">SEAMEO BIOTROP</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-01-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/view/community-beliefs-on-animal-signalling</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11598/btb.2026.33.1.2405</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">BIOTROPIA; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2026): BIOTROPIA Vol. 33 No. 1 January 2026; 60 - 76</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1907-770X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-6334</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11598/btb.2026.33.1.</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia/article/view/community-beliefs-on-animal-signalling/928</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Deny Anjelus Iyai, Yubelince Yustenci Runtuboi, Vapriel A. Pattikawa, Stepani F. Haryati, Azchar Prianka P., Rizki Prasetya, Meky Sagrim, Fitri A. Arief, Ferawati R. Runtuboi, Riskayanti Riskayanti, Ditasari Amalia, Juni C. Dami, Stepanus Pakage</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>