Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

JURIDICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE LEGAL NORM VOID OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES IN INDONESIA

Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017) · hlm. 129–143

DOI
10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.01.07
ISSN
2503-0841, 2356-4512
Terbit
2017-03-31
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

Legal void of interfaith marriages in Indonesia to date has not offered legal certainty and sense of fairness to couples of differing religions. Particularly, their rights to form a family and to freedom of religion are unprotected; whereas those rights are guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court's ruling had rejected Judicial Review on Article 2 section 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The consideration provided by the Bogor District Court regarding the rejection was that the judge's interpretation of article 2 section 1, yielded the assertion that marrying couples should have been of the same faith. The judge also took into consideration the religious values embraced by the prospective applicant who happened to be a Catholic widow while the prospective groom was a Muslim. A similar consideration was made by the Constitutional Court where in, among others, it was stated that the constitutional rights of marriage entailed the obligation to respect the constitutional rights of other people. Therefore, to avoid any conflicts in the implementation of those constitutional rights, it is necessary to have a regulation on the implementation of constitutional rights conducted by the state. Consequently, the juridical implications of interfaith marriage legal norm void give rise to the judges' differing interpretations which are unfavorable to interfaith couples. The validity of these marriages cannot be accomplished, resulting in the marriages to be deemed invalid, implicating the status and position of women and children as well as heritance issues.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

39 penulis · 81 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Airlangga
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Eka Nugraha PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Liza Agnesta KrisnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Febrianika MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Erwin SutantoUniversitas Airlangga1
Frangky ChandraUniversitas Airlangga1
Eduardo GonnelliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rohmat RohmatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Milda IstiqomahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anak Agung Ayu Nanda SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Supriyadi SupriyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dewi Astutty MochtarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suryaning BawonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mufatikhatul FarikhahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Shinta Ayu PurnamawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky EndrawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faizin SulistiyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ansori AnsoriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Thohir LuthAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rossa Ilma SilfiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang SugiriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sihabudin SihabudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang WinarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edwin Steven TulandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ladito Risang BagaskoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nadhilah A. KadirNational University of Malaysia1
Anggi Ari YulianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prija DjatmikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alfons ZakariaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Julisa Aprilia KalukuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fatiha GourariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Solehuddin SolehuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nadhilah A. KadirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ardi FerdianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah Dwi QurbaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Komang Kawi ArtaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">JURIDICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE LEGAL NORM VOID OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES IN INDONESIA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Indrayanti, Kadek Wiwik</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Suhariningsih, Suhariningsih</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ruba'i, Masruchin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aprilianda, Nurini</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Juridical implication</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">legal norm void</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">interfaith marriage</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Legal void of interfaith marriages in Indonesia to date has not offered legal certainty and sense of fairness to couples of differing religions. Particularly, their rights to form a family and to freedom of religion are unprotected; whereas those rights are guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court's ruling had rejected Judicial Review on Article 2 section 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The consideration provided by the Bogor District Court regarding the rejection was that the judge's interpretation of article 2 section 1, yielded the assertion that marrying couples should have been of the same faith. The judge also took into consideration the religious values embraced by the prospective applicant who happened to be a Catholic widow while the prospective groom was a Muslim. A similar consideration was made by the Constitutional Court where in, among others, it was stated that the constitutional rights of marriage entailed the obligation to respect the constitutional rights of other people. Therefore, to avoid any conflicts in the implementation of those constitutional rights, it is necessary to have a regulation on the implementation of constitutional rights conducted by the state.
Consequently, the juridical implications of interfaith marriage legal norm void give rise to the judges' differing interpretations which are unfavorable to interfaith couples. The validity of these marriages cannot be accomplished, resulting in the marriages to be deemed invalid, implicating the status and position of women and children as well as heritance issues.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-03-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/82</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.01.07</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Brawijaya Law Journal; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017): Constitutional Issues and Indigenous Rights; 129-143</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-0841</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2356-4512</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.01</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/82/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2017 Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>