Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Sentencing over Objection to Mobilization as Military Reserve: An analysis of National and International Laws

Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022) · hlm. 1–15

DOI
10.21776/ub.blj.2022.009.01.01
ISSN
2503-0841, 2356-4512
Terbit
2022-04-30
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

Law Number 23 of 2019 concerning National Resource Management for State Defense does not regulate conscientious objection, which refers to the right of a person to refuse to participate in a war or military service on the grounds of religion and morality. Their absence in such services is replaced by other responsibilities such as working in public health services, providing security, and being involved in other social services. Article 77 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2019 expressly provides for sentences that should be imposed on those who refuse to serve as a military reserve, where the rule is not in accordance with the principle of conscientious objection which gives a person the right to refuse on the basis of conscience. This research discusses the legal consequences of the enactment of two rules regarding military service and the application of different conscientious objections. This study applied normative juridical methods and approaches to examine the consistency and relevance of various statutes and government regulations that govern conscientious objection. This study also used conceptual and statutory approaches to explore why conscientious objection is considered a ground for refusal to participate in conscription according to International Human Rights Law. The findings revealed that the conception of defense and compulsory military service in Indonesia does not leave any chance to guarantee the rights of citizens to refuse to participate in military service according to the conscience and belief of every individual (conscientious objection). This is in contrast to the regulatory provisions of international human rights ratified by Indonesia under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Additionally, there is a need for clear arrangements regarding conscientious objection and the requirements that must be met by citizens who submit these principles for the rejection of military service in Indonesia.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

4 penulis · 6 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • University of Debrecen
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Airin LiemantoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Fines FatimahUniversity of Debrecen1
Nur ChanifahUniversity of Brawijaya1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Sentencing over Objection to Mobilization as Military Reserve: An analysis of National and International Laws</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Madjid, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">sentence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">conscientious objection</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">mobilization</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">military reserve</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Law Number 23 of 2019 concerning National Resource Management for State Defense does not regulate conscientious objection, which refers to the right of a person to refuse to participate in a war or military service on the grounds of religion and morality. Their absence in such services is replaced by other responsibilities such as working in public health services, providing security, and being involved in other social services. Article 77 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 23 of 2019 expressly provides for sentences that should be imposed on those who refuse to serve as a military reserve, where the rule is not in accordance with the principle of conscientious objection which gives a person the right to refuse on the basis of conscience. This research discusses the legal consequences of the enactment of two rules regarding military service and the application of different conscientious objections.  This study applied normative juridical methods and approaches to examine the consistency and relevance of various statutes and government regulations that govern conscientious objection. This study also used conceptual and statutory approaches to explore why conscientious objection is considered a ground for refusal to participate in conscription according to International Human Rights Law. The findings revealed that the conception of defense and compulsory military service in Indonesia does not leave any chance to guarantee the rights of citizens to refuse to participate in military service according to the conscience and belief of every individual (conscientious objection). This is in contrast to the regulatory provisions of international human rights ratified by Indonesia under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Additionally, there is a need for clear arrangements regarding conscientious objection and the requirements that must be met by citizens who submit these principles for the rejection of military service in Indonesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/887</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21776/ub.blj.2022.009.01.01</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Brawijaya Law Journal; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): International Law and Security; 1-15</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-0841</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2356-4512</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://lawjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/887/123</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Brawijaya Law Journal</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>