Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education: the influence of gender and teaching duration

Cakrawala Pendidikan · Vol. 41 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 507–520

DOI
10.21831/cp.v41i2.40644
ISSN
2442-8620, 0216-1370
Terbit
2022-05-29
Penerbit
LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Discussion method are increasingly popular in the learning, but in terms of its accuracy, mixed results are reported without clear reasons. This research aims to explore the impact of gender and teaching duration on discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education. To evaluate the accuracy of the use of the discussion method, lecturer's teaching duration and gender, a quantitative study with a correlation approach was used. A research project, which deals with the use of discussion methods in lectures using questionnaires, was carried out in two faculties at two universities. Data were collected from 175 lecturers involved in this research. The analysis is differentiated based on the gender and level of teaching duration of lecturers in the competencies being assessed. The results show that the accuracy of the use of the discussion method is low and is related to the gender of the lecturer, that males perceive themselves to be higher in the use of the discussion method than females, and that even using method analysis with methods and implementation in the classroom. Lecturers who teach more than 30 years tend to have higher accuracy in using the discussion method than those with lesser tenure. The findings of this study have implications for the development of "the use of discussion methods in higher education" and it is necessary to examine the reasons behind this difference and to look for steps to improve the accuracy of the use of the discussion method.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

25 penulis · 69 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 46 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Islamic University of Riau
  • IPB University
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong
  • Universitas Islam DDI A.G.H Abdurrahman Ambo Dalle
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Universiti Teknologi Petronas
  • Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Firdaus FirdausIslamic University of Riau4
Amril AmrilUniversitas Jambi3
Muhammad Yusuf AhmadIslamic University of Riau3
St. MarwiyahUniversitas Islam Negeri Palopo3
Agus YudiawanInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong2
St. UmrahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong2
Charlina CharlinaRiau University2
Ahmad Zabidi Abdul RazakUniversity of Malaya2
Agustina AgustinaUniversitas Negeri Padang2
Khalilullah Amin AhmadUniversiti Islam Antarabangsa Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin2
Miftah SyarifIslamic University of Riau2
Mukhtar MukhtarUniversitas Islam DDI A.G.H Abdurrahman Ambo Dalle1
Basri MahmudUniversitas Islam DDI A.G.H Abdurrahman Ambo Dalle1
Mesiono MesionoUniversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara1
Suparliadi SuparliadiUniversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara1
Neneng Uswatun HasanahIPB University1
Fifi Fata'tiatul HidayahIPB University1
Hasbullah HasbullahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Sorong1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education: the influence of gender and teaching duration</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Tambak, Syahraini</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hamzah, Hamzah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ahmad, M. Yusuf</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Siregar, Erma Linda</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sukenti, Desi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sabdin, Mashitah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rohimah, Ratu Bai</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Discussion method</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Islamic higher education</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">lecture</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">discussion method accuracy</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Discussion method are increasingly popular in the learning, but in terms of its accuracy, mixed results are reported without clear reasons. This research aims to explore the impact of gender and teaching duration on discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education. To evaluate the accuracy of the use of the discussion method, lecturer's teaching duration and gender, a quantitative study with a correlation approach was used. A research project, which deals with the use of discussion methods in lectures using questionnaires, was carried out in two faculties at two universities. Data were collected from 175 lecturers involved in this research. The analysis is differentiated based on the gender and level of teaching duration of lecturers in the competencies being assessed. The results show that the accuracy of the use of the discussion method is low and is related to the gender of the lecturer, that males perceive themselves to be higher in the use of the discussion method than females, and that even using method analysis with methods and implementation in the classroom. Lecturers who teach more than 30 years tend to have higher accuracy in using the discussion method than those with lesser tenure. The findings of this study have implications for the development of "the use of discussion methods in higher education" and it is necessary to examine the reasons behind this difference and to look for steps to improve the accuracy of the use of the discussion method.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-05-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/40644</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/cp.v41i2.40644</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2022): Cakrawala Pendidikan (June 2022); 507-520</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-8620</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0216-1370</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/40644/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>