Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Elections as a means of citizens political education: A comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia

Cakrawala Pendidikan · Vol. 41 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 129–141

DOI
10.21831/cp.v41i1.44305
ISSN
2442-8620, 0216-1370
Terbit
2021-02-28
Penerbit
LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The purpose of this study is to compare Indonesian and Malaysian elections in terms of (1) legal basis, (2) organizing institution, (3) implementation, (4) political party function, and (5) public participation. It was a library study using a qualitative approach. Documentation was used to gather information. The data were analyzed descriptively using the Miles and Haberman model. The data were collected, grouped, reduced, interpreted, and concluded. The data were interpreted based on concepts, theories, and critical analysis. Cross-checking was used as the data validity technique. The results of this study are (1) Indonesia has hosted 12 elections, some of which have been influenced by political dynamics, including Law No. 12 of 2003 concerning Elections for the 2004 Election, Law No. 10 of 2008, and Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Malaysian elections are governed by two laws: (a) the Malaysian Law on General Election Deed 1958 and (b) the Malaysian Law on General Election Error Act 1954. (c) P.U.(A) 293/2002 concerning the General Election (Voter Registration) Regulation last amended by P.U.(A) 106/2012; (d) P.U.(A) 185/2003 concerning Election Regulation (Post Elections) 2003; (e) P.U.(A) 386/1981 concerning General Election Regulations (Execution of Grand Elections) 1981, last amended by P.U. (A) 134/2013. (2) General Election Commission (KPU) is the name of the election organizers, whereas General Election Institute is the name of the election organizers in the New Order Era (LPU). Suruhanjaya Choice Raya is the Malaysian election organizer (SPR) (3) The election system in Malaysia is simpler and more efficient. Malaysia uses the District Election System which is based on the location of the election district, not the population. The election system in Indonesia uses the proportional election system. (4) Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy and adheres to a parliamentary democracy system. Both Indonesia and Malaysia adhere to a multi-party system. (5) The average voter turnout in Malaysian elections is 85 percent, while voter turnout in Indonesia is only 74 percent. In general, Malaysian elections are worse than those in Indonesia. In Malaysia, election organizers tend to favor government parties. Suruhanjaya Choice Raya Malaysia (SPR) barred Diaspora residents in other nations from using the post in 2018, claiming that the Diaspora favored opposition parties.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

29 penulis · 70 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Universitas Pamulang
  • Cenderawasih University
  • Indonesia Open University
  • University of Aberdeen
  • Universitas PGRI Madiun
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Mukhamad MurdionoYogyakarta State University4
Eny KusdariniYogyakarta State University4
Iqbal ArpannudinYogyakarta State University4
Iffah NurhayatiYogyakarta State University3
Setiati WidihastutiYogyakarta State University3
Miftahuddin MiftahuddinYogyakarta State University2
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University2
Rahayu SubektiSebelas Maret University2
Yayuk HidayahYogyakarta State University2
Chandra Dewi PuspitasariYogyakarta State University2
Nurdiyana NurdiyanaYogyakarta State University2
Akmal FirmansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eni KurniawatiYogyakarta State University1
M.Pd., Mukhamad MurdionoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Budi Eko MulyonoYogyakarta State University1
Edi SofwanUniversitas Pamulang1
Muhammad SopiyanaUniversitas Pamulang1
Suharno SuharnoCenderawasih University1
Nasiwan NasiwanYogyakarta State University1
Fatikhah Fauziah HanumYogyakarta State University1
Dwi RiyantiIndonesia Open University1
SuyatnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yoga Ardian FeriandiUniversitas PGRI Madiun1
Ika Tri YunianikaUniversity of Aberdeen1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Elections as a means of citizens political education: A comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sunarso, Sunarso</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suyato, Suyato</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kuncorowati, Puji Wulandari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Manik, Toba Sastrawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fathurrahman, Ali Masykur</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Malaysia</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Political Education</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Election</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study is to compare Indonesian and Malaysian elections in terms of (1) legal basis, (2) organizing institution, (3) implementation, (4) political party function, and (5) public participation. It was a library study using a qualitative approach. Documentation was used to gather information. The data were analyzed descriptively using the Miles and Haberman model. The data were collected, grouped, reduced, interpreted, and concluded. The data were interpreted based on concepts, theories, and critical analysis. Cross-checking was used as the data validity technique. The results of this study are (1) Indonesia has hosted 12 elections, some of which have been influenced by political dynamics, including Law No. 12 of 2003 concerning Elections for the 2004 Election, Law No. 10 of 2008, and Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Malaysian elections are governed by two laws: (a) the Malaysian Law on General Election Deed 1958 and (b) the Malaysian Law on General Election Error Act 1954. (c) P.U.(A) 293/2002 concerning the General Election (Voter Registration) Regulation last amended by P.U.(A) 106/2012; (d) P.U.(A) 185/2003 concerning Election Regulation (Post Elections) 2003; (e) P.U.(A) 386/1981 concerning General Election Regulations (Execution of Grand Elections) 1981, last amended by P.U. (A) 134/2013. (2) General Election Commission (KPU) is the name of the election organizers, whereas General Election Institute is the name of the election organizers in the New Order Era (LPU). Suruhanjaya Choice Raya is the Malaysian election organizer (SPR) (3) The election system in Malaysia is simpler and more efficient. Malaysia uses the District Election System which is based on the location of the election district, not the population. The election system in Indonesia uses the proportional election system. (4) Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy and adheres to a parliamentary democracy system. Both Indonesia and Malaysia adhere to a multi-party system. (5) The average voter turnout in Malaysian elections is 85 percent, while voter turnout in Indonesia is only 74 percent. In general, Malaysian elections are worse than those in Indonesia. In Malaysia, election organizers tend to favor government parties. Suruhanjaya Choice Raya Malaysia (SPR) barred Diaspora residents in other nations from using the post in 2018, claiming that the Diaspora favored opposition parties.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-02-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/44305</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/cp.v41i1.44305</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan; Vol. 41 No. 1 (2022): Cakrawala Pendidikan (February 2022); 129-141</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-8620</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0216-1370</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/44305/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Cakrawala Pendidikan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>