Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Analysis of the online microteaching practice of undergraduate physical education students

Cakrawala Pendidikan · Vol. 44 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 63–71

DOI
10.21831/cp.v44i1.61743
ISSN
2442-8620, 0216-1370
Terbit
2025-01-31
Penerbit
LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Microteaching aims to ensure that students, as prospective educators, deserve to experience real teaching-learning situations. However, in light of recent advancements in educational technology and the increasing integration of online learning, it has been carried out online. This study aims to analyze students' competence in the online microteaching practice. This is classroom action research with three determined indicators as the basis for constructing a Likert scale questionnaire. 132/150 students are participating in this study. A descriptive statistical test was used to analyze the data, and students' opinions were also recorded to strengthen the results. Almost all students (98.4%) pretty much understand the microteaching practice, and quite well (97.7%) understand how to use the online application for online microteaching practice. Also, they are satisfied (99.9%) with the quality of online microteaching practices. In simple real-life learning practices, of the 132 respondents, only 68.1% mastered the characteristics of their students, 60.6% applied learning tools, and 60.6% implemented periodic assessments. We concluded that students' competence towards online microteaching practice is good, and they know the advantages and disadvantages of conducting an online class. However, the skills demonstrated by students in online situations were different and inconsistent with those exhibited in offline settings.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 291 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Setya RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui16
Heny SetyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Mugiyo HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui13
Sugiharto SugihartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Ipang SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Martin SudarmonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Harry PramonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Dwi Gansar Santi WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Soegiyanto SoegiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Agung WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Cahyo YuwonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Agus PujiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Mohammad Arif AliAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
RuminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Moch Fahmi AbdulazizAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Soegiyanto KSAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Roas IrsyadaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Adi SAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Tri RustiadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Dwi Tiga PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang4
Agus DarmawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Endang Sri HananiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Gustiana Mega AnggitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Hari SetijonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nasuka NasukaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SupriyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SulaimanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SoedjatmikoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Oktia Woro Kasmini HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Rumini RuminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Fery DarmantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analysis of the online microteaching practice of undergraduate physical education students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Raharjo, Hermawan Pamot</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kusuma, Donny Wira Yudha</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mohamed, Ani Mazlina Dewi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rahayu, Tandiyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Annas, Mohamad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Putra, Ranu Baskora Aji</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suripto, Agus Widodo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kurniawan, Wahyu Ragil</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">online classes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">affective domain</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">teaching-learning activities</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Microteaching aims to ensure that students, as prospective educators, deserve to experience real teaching-learning situations. However, in light of recent advancements in educational technology and the increasing integration of online learning, it has been carried out online. This study aims to analyze students' competence in the online microteaching practice. This is classroom action research with three determined indicators as the basis for constructing a Likert scale questionnaire. 132/150 students are participating in this study. A descriptive statistical test was used to analyze the data, and students' opinions were also recorded to strengthen the results. Almost all students (98.4%) pretty much understand the microteaching practice, and quite well (97.7%) understand how to use the online application for online microteaching practice. Also, they are satisfied (99.9%) with the quality of online microteaching practices. In simple real-life learning practices, of the 132 respondents, only 68.1% mastered the characteristics of their students, 60.6% applied learning tools, and 60.6% implemented periodic assessments. We concluded that students' competence towards online microteaching practice is good, and they know the advantages and disadvantages of conducting an online class. However, the skills demonstrated by students in online situations were different and inconsistent with those exhibited in offline settings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-01-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/61743</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/cp.v44i1.61743</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2025): Cakrawala Pendidikan (February 2025); 63-71</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-8620</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0216-1370</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/61743/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Hermawan Pamot Raharjo, Mohammad Arif Ali, Tandiyo Rahayu, Ani Mazlina Dewi Mohamed, Leo Nacion Santillana, Donny Wira Yudha Kusuma, Mohamad Annas, Ranu Baskora Aji Putra, Agus Widodo Suripto, Wahyu Ragil Kurniawan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>