Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

The clinical potential and limits of the all-ceramic fixed partial denture restorations

Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) · Vol. 40 No. 4 (2007) · hlm. 186–192

DOI
10.20473/j.djmkg.v40.i4.p186-192
ISSN
2442-9740, 1978-3728
Terbit
2007-12-01
Penerbit
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

High-strength all-ceramic systems for fixed partial dentures (FPDs) is gaining popularity as an alternative to the well established metal-ceramic FPDs. Several new framework materials and technique such as lithium disilicate, aluminum oxide and yttrium tetragonal zirconia polycrystal have been developed with improved strength, marginal discrepancy and esthetics. Since not every all-ceramic system can be used for a variety application, proper selection of the materials is an important for the success of all-ceramic FPDs. The longevity of dental restorations is an important health concern and the clinician placed great emphasis on mechanical properties to define the clinical indication of the ceramic materials because of their brittleness and low fracture toughness. The stronger and tougher framework material would improve the reliability and the longevity of dental restoration. To fabricated of an all-ceramic FPDs, material would be required with a flexural strength in excess of 300 MPa and fracture toughness 3 MPa/m½. Zirconium has a better mechanical properties than alumina and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, result from the transformation toughening, free of glass phase and minimal flaws. Whereas lithium disilicate glass-ceramic has a better translucency than alumina and zirconium based ceramic, result from the higher content of glass phase than that two materials. The purpose of this article is to present the information that can guide the practioner in the decision making process about all-ceramic FPDs systems. It can be concluded that the all-ceramic FPDs are seems to be an acceptable clinically prosthodontic treatment according to the short-term studies and the lithium disilicate and alumina-based ceramic materials are acceptable for 3 units anterior FPDs, whereas zirconia-based ceramic are acceptable for 3–5 units anterior and posterior FPDs with 2 pontics. However, further investigation and more clinical long-term follow-up studies are needed.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

18 penulis · 67 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Agus DahlanUniversitas Airlangga3
Muhammad Dimas Aditya AriUniversitas Airlangga2
Ratri Maya SitalaksmiUniversitas Airlangga2
Sherman SalimUniversitas Airlangga1
Sonya HarwasihUniversitas Airlangga1
Bambang Agustono Satmoko TumaliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Michael Josef Kridanto KamadjajaUniversitas Airlangga1
Alya Nisrina Sajidah GatiaUniversitas Airlangga1
Agtadilla NovitanandaUniversitas Airlangga1
Lintang Maudina SantosaUniversitas Airlangga1
Valerian LaksonoUniversitas Airlangga1
Real Akbar Aucky SanjayaUniversitas Airlangga1
Tasya Regita PramestiUniversitas Airlangga1
Nadia KartikasariUniversitas Airlangga1
Muhammad Rafi Nurfaiz ArifinUniversitas Airlangga1
Aurelia Della ImaniUniversitas Airlangga1
Aisyah Rachmadani Putri GofurUniversitas Airlangga1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The clinical potential and limits of the all-ceramic fixed partial denture restorations</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Laksono, Harry</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">all-ceramic</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">fixed partial dentures</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">framework</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">High-strength all-ceramic systems for fixed partial dentures (FPDs) is gaining popularity as an alternative to the well established metal-ceramic FPDs. Several new framework materials and technique such as lithium disilicate, aluminum oxide and yttrium tetragonal zirconia polycrystal have been developed with improved strength, marginal discrepancy and esthetics. Since not every all-ceramic system can be used for a variety application, proper selection of the materials is an important for the success of all-ceramic FPDs. The longevity of dental restorations is an important health concern and the clinician placed great emphasis on mechanical properties to define the clinical indication of the ceramic materials because of their brittleness and low fracture toughness. The stronger and tougher framework material would improve the reliability and the longevity of dental restoration. To fabricated of an all-ceramic FPDs, material would be required with a flexural strength in excess of 300 MPa and fracture toughness 3 MPa/m½. Zirconium has a better mechanical properties than alumina and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, result from the transformation toughening, free of glass phase and minimal flaws. Whereas lithium disilicate glass-ceramic has a better translucency than alumina and zirconium based ceramic, result from the higher content of glass phase than that two materials. The purpose of this article is to present the information that can guide the practioner in the decision making process about all-ceramic FPDs systems. It can be concluded that the all-ceramic FPDs are seems to be an acceptable clinically prosthodontic treatment according to the short-term studies and the lithium disilicate and alumina-based ceramic materials are acceptable for 3 units anterior FPDs, whereas zirconia-based ceramic are acceptable for 3–5 units anterior and posterior FPDs with 2 pontics. However, further investigation and more clinical long-term follow-up studies are needed.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2007-12-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/1040</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/j.djmkg.v40.i4.p186-192</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi); Vol. 40 No. 4 (2007): December 2007; 186-192</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9740</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-3728</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/1040/823</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2015 Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>